Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: mp3 file transcoded or not?
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - General
hxkclan
i was wondering sometimes i dl some tracks of the net, then i dl a higher bitrate version from a song sometimes. unsure.gif

But is it possible to see if someone didnt transcoded the song from 192kb/s to 256 or something?

i already have mr questionman and encspot, but i didnt really find something usefull dry.gif
sTisTi
QUOTE(hxkclan @ Jan 17 2006, 06:52 PM)
i was wondering sometimes i dl some tracks of the net, then i dl a higher bitrate version from a song sometimes.  unsure.gif

But is it possible to see if someone didnt transcoded the song from 192kb/s to 256 or something?

i already have mr questionman and encspot, but i didnt really find something usefull  dry.gif
*


Sometimes you can see it in a spectral view with a WAV editor. If a 192 or 256 file has a lowpass of 16 kHz (which is typical for 128kbps), it's probably not an original encoding - but there may be exceptions to this, as e.g. some encoders like the old l3enc (IIRC) always use a lowpass of 16 kHz even at 320 kbps.
Brink
You can use foobar and your windows calc to check it(or a foobar plugin).
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpost&p=313839
skelly831
QUOTE(sTisTi @ Jan 17 2006, 11:44 AM)
Sometimes you can see it in a spectral view with a WAV editor. If a 192 or 256 file has a lowpass of 16 kHz (which is typical for 128kbps), it's probably not an original encoding - but there may be exceptions to this, as e.g. some encoders like the old l3enc (IIRC) always use a lowpass of 16 kHz even at 320 kbps.
*


This is what exactly what I do, I've seen files encoded with Lame 3.90.3 APS that have a 16Khz lowpass, that means either the file is trans/reen-coded from a lower quality file or someone changed the lowpass during the original encode.
hxkclan
ok thank you people this will help me out for a while biggrin.gif

edit: or there must be other ideas ofcourse unsure.gif
Jojo
QUOTE(Brink @ Jan 17 2006, 01:20 PM)
You can use foobar and your windows calc to check it(or a foobar plugin).
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpost&p=313839
*


only works with properly encoded Lame files that got the headers and everything. See tread for details.
zima
I wonder...is it possible to somehow "batch check" this, on large number of files at once?
For my needs it would suffice if I could know in an automated way which of my files are for sure not transcoded, and than look closer at the rest.
Brink
QUOTE
only works with properly encoded Lame files that got the headers and everything. See tread for details.

Yep, thats why I linked to the thread and not only copied the method. And its still what zima is looking for, except for the batch check. "way which of my files are for sure not transcoded, and than look closer at the rest."

But I just think if you are downloading files and thing they are good in your equipment, you dont need to be so paranoid about transcoding.
NeoRenegade
QUOTE(skelly831 @ Jan 17 2006, 03:27 PM)
QUOTE(sTisTi @ Jan 17 2006, 11:44 AM)
Sometimes you can see it in a spectral view with a WAV editor. If a 192 or 256 file has a lowpass of 16 kHz (which is typical for 128kbps), it's probably not an original encoding - but there may be exceptions to this, as e.g. some encoders like the old l3enc (IIRC) always use a lowpass of 16 kHz even at 320 kbps.
*


This is what exactly what I do, I've seen files encoded with Lame 3.90.3 APS that have a 16Khz lowpass, that means either the file is trans/reen-coded from a lower quality file or someone changed the lowpass during the original encode.
*

Mostly the latter, I hope.

Over the years, it's been somewhat popular to use -Y or --lowpass 16 with APS.
boojum
I thought there was software for this, and a search revealed that there is. I think this might help: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....etect+transcode

cool.gif
sTisTi
QUOTE(boojum @ Jan 18 2006, 08:15 PM)
I thought there was software for this, and a search revealed that there is.  I think this might help:  http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....etect+transcode

cool.gif
*


That's just meant for differentiating between CDDA and MP3 encodes (which it does quite well IMHO), not between MP3 and transcoded MP3.
zima
QUOTE(Brink @ Jan 18 2006, 06:18 PM)
QUOTE
only works with properly encoded Lame files that got the headers and everything. See tread for details.

Yep, thats why I linked to the thread and not only copied the method. And its still what zima is looking for, except for the batch check. "way which of my files are for sure not transcoded, and than look closer at the rest."

Oh well, I guess I'll have to do it manually...or perhaps there is some foobar plugin developer wanting to automate this task a bit? tongue.gif
QUOTE
But I just think if you are downloading files and thing they are good in your equipment, you dont need to be so paranoid about transcoding.
*


Basically you're right, I just want mostly to exclude such files from further circulation...
(BTW, I hope discussing it on such vague level doesn't violae TOS...)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.