QUOTE(hybridfan @ Feb 9 2006, 03:07 PM)
Why do a lot of people like Winamp, I find it to buggy and uses high resources, I do like the media library option but I use Apollo now, what do you guys think about Winamp. I know a lot of people here use foobar but it looks a bit complicated too me.
Resource usage : Depends on the plugins you use, and the skin (if Winamp 5 skins are being used). The core of winamp, which comes from the 2.x days, wasn't too hungry on resources.
Buggy : Sorry, i am not experiencing bugs so it would help to know which ones have you found.
Media library : As you say, it's good. I use mostly the streaming part of it, but when i use it to find my tracks, i find it good enough.
Apollo : I used it back in 2000 and 2001. I still think it was one of the best GUI designs for a player, and in fact, foobar2000 remembers me that a bit.
conclusion :
Apollo is a good player and since it supports many winamp plugins, the playback abilities are on par with other players.
Foobar is still maturing, from my point of view. Once version 0.9 stabilizes, and the dozens of plugins that exist for 0.8 are ported, it could probably be packed and preconfigured very nicely (but who knows if this will be the case).
Winamp: It seems to be coming back to life. Winamp 3 was quite a fiasco, (winamp 5 can use winamp 3 skins, but the code was rewritten. and most of the other parts weren't reused), and original Nullsoft team abandoning it didn't do a favour either.
Btw... IMO