Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: How's is -q1 for DVD audio downmixed to stereo
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > Ogg Vorbis > Ogg Vorbis - General
birdie
I would like to convert a DVD movie audio track (the originial audio is AC3 5.1 384Kbit/sec) into stereo using oggenc -q1 quality setting. Is it a very bad idea or I should choose a higher quality setting like -q3? Note that the converted audio will be heard on low cost acoustics.

:-( I cannot edit the subject of the message.
stephanV
I think you mean ac3 instead of aac?

Personally I use -q0 for the exact same purpose and I am satisfied with it. So IMO not a bad idea at all.
gameplaya15143
here is what I do:

downmix the 5.1 to stereo (NOT surround2, vorbis has issues with it)

encode with -q 0 --advanced-encode-option lowpass_frequency=999

(adjust the lowpass and other advanced options at your own discression)

edit: typo
birdie
Thank you for your advice. What does "--advance-encode-option lowpass_frequency=999" option do exactly? Does it cut frequencies below 999Hz or what?
Gambit
QUOTE(gameplaya15143 @ Mar 4 2006, 05:29 PM)
here is what I do:

downmix the 5.1 to stereo (NOT surround2, vorbis has issues with it)

encode with -q 0 --advance-encode-option lowpass_frequency=999

(adjust the lowpass and other advanced options at your own discression)
*


What kind of issues?

Also, IIRC the lowpass_frequency option accepts parameters in kHz, and that would make using your value of "999" nonsense.
HotshotGG
QUOTE
I would like to convert a DVD movie audio track (the originial audio is AC3 5.1 384Kbit/sec) into stereo using oggenc -q1 quality setting. Is it a very bad idea or I should choose a higher quality setting like -q3? Note that the converted audio will be heard on low cost acoustics.


I would stick with a -q 6 whether the mix is stereo or multichannel. Vorbis doesn't have the proper channel coupling right now for multichannel mixes, although this is a top priority that will eventually get sorted out.
gameplaya15143
QUOTE(birdie @ Mar 5 2006, 06:05 AM)
Thank you for your advice. What does "--advance-encode-option lowpass_frequency=999" option do exactly? Does it cut frequencies below 999Hz or what?
*

it overrides the default lowpass... and that would move the lowpass to the max (effectively off at 999khz)


QUOTE(Gambit @ Mar 5 2006, 06:18 AM)
What kind of issues?

Also, IIRC the lowpass_frequency option accepts parameters in kHz, and that would make using your value of "999" nonsense.
*

issues with rear channels, tinny flanging nastyness, especially if its people talking, and was there even at -q 4.. in most cases I am unable to hear much of a difference between surround2 and stereo when encoded to vorbis at -q 0... but this 'issue' may also be because i didnt use any lowpass on the surround information (i'm actually trying headac3he's surround lowpass thing now) unsure.gif

... sure 999 is excessive... 24 is enough to make the lowpass efectively off when the sample rate is 48khz rolleyes.gif
HotshotGG
QUOTE
I would like to convert a DVD movie audio track (the originial audio is AC3 5.1 384Kbit/sec) into stereo using oggenc -q1 quality setting. Is it a very bad idea or I should choose a higher quality setting like -q3? Note that the converted audio will be heard on low cost acoustics.

:-( I cannot edit the subject of the message.


On second thought, why the hell would you need to downmix it? are you telling me there is no a PCM stereo mix already on that disc that you can encode from? If this is a DVD Movie disc I am pretty confident there are two seperate mixes one AC3 5.1 mix and another PCM stereo one. Some movies are mixed better when it comes to 5.1 also. With a lot of other movies I often wonder why they even bother creating 5.1 mixes for them. biggrin.gif
Gambit
QUOTE(HotshotGG @ Mar 5 2006, 07:50 PM)
QUOTE
I would like to convert a DVD movie audio track (the originial audio is AC3 5.1 384Kbit/sec) into stereo using oggenc -q1 quality setting. Is it a very bad idea or I should choose a higher quality setting like -q3? Note that the converted audio will be heard on low cost acoustics.

I would stick with a -q 6 whether the mix is stereo or multichannel. Vorbis doesn't have the proper channel coupling right now for multichannel mixes, although this is a top priority that will eventually get sorted out.
*

He is encoding to stereo, so channel coupling has nothing to do with this. And q6 is way to high, q3 or q4 should be just fine. Hell, you probably wouldn't hear the difference with a lower settings either.

QUOTE(gameplaya15143 @ Mar 6 2006, 02:55 AM)
QUOTE(birdie @ Mar 5 2006, 06:05 AM)
Thank you for your advice. What does "--advance-encode-option lowpass_frequency=999" option do exactly? Does it cut frequencies below 999Hz or what?
*

it overrides the default lowpass... and that would move the lowpass to the max (effectively off at 999khz)
*

Disabling the lowpass at those bitrates is absolutely insane, and just proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. Oh and btw, it's "--advanced-encode-option". At least make sure you type it correctly, when you make your 1337 recommendations, so that it actually works for people.

QUOTE(gameplaya15143 @ Mar 6 2006, 02:55 AM)
QUOTE(Gambit @ Mar 5 2006, 06:18 AM)
What kind of issues?
Also, IIRC the lowpass_frequency option accepts parameters in kHz, and that would make using your value of "999" nonsense.
*

issues with rear channels, tinny flanging nastyness, especially if its people talking, and was there even at -q 4.. in most cases I am unable to hear much of a difference between surround2 and stereo when encoded to vorbis at -q 0... but this 'issue' may also be because i didnt use any lowpass on the surround information (i'm actually trying headac3he's surround lowpass thing now) unsure.gif
*

Aha, so it doesn't have issues with Surround 2, but rather with your "expert" settings. May I remind you of our beloved TOS #8 again?

QUOTE(HotshotGG @ Mar 6 2006, 06:21 AM)
On second thought, why the hell would you need to downmix it? are you telling me there is no a PCM stereo mix already on that disc that you can encode from? If this is a DVD Movie disc I am pretty confident there are two seperate mixes one AC3 5.1 mix and another PCM stereo one. Some movies are mixed better when it comes to 5.1 also. With a lot of other movies I often wonder why they even bother creating 5.1 mixes for them.  biggrin.gif
*

Erm, PCM stereo tracks on movie DVDs are very rare. Actually, I'm pretty sure I personally have never seen such a disc.
stephanV
I have one DVD that has a LPCM stereo track at 48 kHz (also the only audio track on that DVD), but it's quite rare yes. A LPCM stereo track takes up more than 3 times the space of a 5.1 AC3 track.

Sometimes there is also a 2ch AC3 track, but I wouldn't know which would be better to use as source. At settings below q2 it will probably get hard to state a preference.
gameplaya15143
QUOTE(Gambit @ Mar 6 2006, 02:41 AM)
He is encoding to stereo, so channel coupling has nothing to do with this. And q6 is way to high, q3 or q4 should be just fine. Hell, you probably wouldn't hear the difference with a lower settings either.
..comments on q 6 below.
QUOTE(Gambit @ Mar 6 2006, 02:41 AM)
Disabling the lowpass at those bitrates is absolutely insane, and just proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. Oh and btw, it's "--advanced-encode-option". At least make sure you type it correctly, when you make your 1337 recommendations, so that it actually works for people.
oops, I've edited my post to correct that sweat.gif
to everyone their own (opinion)

QUOTE(Gambit @ Mar 5 2006, 06:18 AM)
What kind of issues?
Also, IIRC the lowpass_frequency option accepts parameters in kHz, and that would make using your value of "999" nonsense.
basically nonsense, but 999.0000 is as high as the lowpass goes for oggenc, even at -q 10.... but enough of lowpass talk......

QUOTE(Gambit @ Mar 5 2006, 06:18 AM)
Aha, so it doesn't have issues with Surround 2, but rather with your "expert" settings. May I remind you of our beloved TOS #8 again?
let's not be to hasty... allow me to further explain.. When I first heard the problem, the very first thing I tried was to encode without my custom settings. Starting at q 0 and increasing the quality setting (using the default lowpass)... I was still able to hear the flanginess (although barely) at q 4. At q 6 I could not. (my initial though on this was the lossy stereo, it was said that at q6 only lossless stereo coupling was used.. I hear this isn't the case with aotuv)... so I second HotshotGG's recomendation of q 6, but only if downmixing to prologic(II). I can not provide abx tests to prove that I could hear this problem, it was quite some time ago (using vorbis 1.0.1) and I no longer have this problem file. (it was the evangelion movie death and rebirth, the very beginning sequence)... I am merely sharing my experience here as a caution for others when encoding downmixed (surround(2)) audio to vorbis.. and is the reason why I personally downmix to stereo instead.
HotshotGG
QUOTE
let's not be to hasty... allow me to further explain.. When I first heard the problem, the very first thing I tried was to encode without my custom settings. Starting at q 0 and increasing the quality setting (using the default lowpass)... I was still able to hear the flanginess (although barely) at q 4. At q 6 I could not. (my initial though on this was the lossy stereo, it was said that at q6 only lossless stereo coupling was used.. I hear this isn't the case with aotuv)... so I second HotshotGG's recomendation of q 6, but only if downmixing to prologic(II).


it's proven fact. Vorbis was specifically designed that way for concerned "audiophiles" who didn't want the stereo image quantized, because they would loose sleep at night above -q 6 that is. The mapping specification in the code is their and John33 fixed it for Vorbis decoding I compliance stream, but the coupling routines for more than one submap aren't there. It would be a real pain in the behind to write them too. The lowpass is ok in some circumstance, don't play around with it all of the time though. laugh.gif

QUOTE
I have one DVD that has a LPCM stereo track at 48 kHz (also the only audio track on that DVD), but it's quite rare yes. A LPCM stereo track takes up more than 3 times the space of a 5.1 AC3 track.


I prefer LPCM mixes. A few of my DVD's have them I believe. LPCM mixes or lossless should be used on DVD-A mixes anyway. It's better that way. It's not like they don't have the space, despite the fact we are discussing DVD-V. biggrin.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.