dnewhous
Mar 25 2006, 09:16
Yamaha used to make a burner that would do this. Has there ever been another? I would like to do this because adhesive labels does not seam like a proper way to archive CD's.
dreamliner77
Mar 25 2006, 09:23
The technology was called "disc T@2." You can find the same technology in NEC's Labelflash drives.
Also, adhesive labels can be very bad for the discs. Let Sharpie be your friend.
dnewhous
Mar 25 2006, 09:54
QUOTE(dreamliner77 @ Mar 25 2006, 10:23 AM)
Let Sharpie be your friend.
My handwriting sucks. Did the Yamaha technology require special CD-R's to work? You can buy used drives off of ebay.
And Labelflash can only be applied to DVD's. HP Lightscribe is the current technology.
Never_Again
Mar 28 2006, 23:10
Have you looked at printable CD-Rs?
Sebastian Mares
Mar 29 2006, 01:19
Printable CD-Rs require a printer that can print onto the CDs' label.
DARcode
Mar 29 2006, 04:08
See here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/02/14/lab...ightscribe_dvd/LabelFlash is slightly better, but it's a NEC proprietary standard with media not so easy to find, LightScribe is more widespread.
dnewhous
Mar 29 2006, 07:01
QUOTE(Sebastian Mares @ Mar 29 2006, 02:19 AM)
Printable CD-Rs require a printer that can print onto the CDs' label.
And I believe they only work with inkjets, which I wouldn't be caught dead using.
Remedial Sound
Mar 29 2006, 09:13
Actually inkjet disc label printers have improved greatly over the last couple of years. We just got a Primera Bravo II autoprinter at my work and it blows our old Epson p.o.s. out of the water.
http://www.primera.com/bravoII_auto_printer.htmlAmazing quality, but at a price about 1200 USD.
Printable CDs/DVDs are by far the best method. Fastest, nice quality (like a normal color print), no negative impact on the media. Lightscribe/Labelflash are much slower, much worse quality, but also no negative impact. Adhesive labels, don't use them, they will warp the media over time!