QUOTE(D.Sync @ Dec 23 2007, 03:32)

Thanks for the reply. Btw, will this plugin caused any PERMANENT DAMAGE to my iPod Classic 6G? Just curious and wonder should I just use iTunes or foobar2k.
Directly - it's not really possible. I have not seen any issues but worst case is using disk mode on your iPod and restoring it.
QUOTE(D.Sync @ Dec 23 2007, 03:32)

The fact is, after I had added my music (1xxxx) songs to iTunes library, iTunes automatically fill in the 'Comment' tab with numbers, eg: 1000dx0c030..... My thought will be, that number indicates iTunes normalize volume details? It's kinda weird as it totally mess up my Comment idTag.
It uses one for SoundCheck data and one for gapless data as far as I know, but I think the latter will only turn up in iTunes encoded files.
QUOTE(D.Sync @ Dec 23 2007, 03:32)

Besides, I had issues after I had added those songs to iTunes. It delete the cover art embedded inside the mp3 files. Whenever I click a particular album, it only shows a BLANK WHITE image instead of the cover art itself. Foobar2k wouldn't have such issues, would it?
Sounds like id3 mess. I think foobar preserves album art these days but I'm not sure.
QUOTE(D.Sync @ Dec 23 2007, 03:32)

Not only that, iTunes aren't able to read the track title correctly. Eg: A song had tagged with title 'A Dreadful Night'. When displayed in foobar2k, the title column just displayed the title, which is 'A Dreadful Night'. However, when displayed in iTunes, it showed up as 'Album name - Artist name - A Dreadful Night'. After I click and play the song, then only the title changed back to 'A Dreadful Night' (notice that the album-artist name had gone)
Possibly multiple tags with different values in the file, or maybe that was the filename ?
QUOTE(D.Sync @ Dec 23 2007, 03:32)

In my opinion, I didn't think iTunes had improved much, especially it's music library. Hopefully my choice to use foobar2k + foo_dop will be a wise choice.
Well if it is not you can always switch back to iTunes...
QUOTE(D.Sync @ Dec 23 2007, 03:32)

Just crossing my finger for foo_dop next updates. (stable update

)
What are you looking for in the updates ?
QUOTE(ipse @ Dec 23 2007, 20:08)

Are there any plans to use foo_converter to convert files instead of own implementation? Own implementation looks pretty bare - e.g. no support for presets and simultaneous encoding. And rather then re-invent wheel, isn't it better to use existing piece of code? That's a good dream of code reusability.
Well, it's not possible because there is no API for foo_converter. (Even if there was, I don't see any APIs in foobar2000 SDK with custom progress hooks so say hello to double progress dialogs) Converting multiple files simultaneously is not exactly related to this either.
QUOTE(ipse @ Dec 23 2007, 20:08)

Is there any existing nice-looking foobar preset with foo_dop? I want to upload one on my iPod nano to be able work with it on machines that do not have iTunes/foobar2000 installed. That is smth. like a "portable foodop". By nice-looking I mean user-friendliness in the first place - like all foo_dop commands put as buttons on UI to be accessible in one cllick, etc.
I don't know of any, sorry.
QUOTE(radecke @ Dec 25 2007, 18:14)

is there a way to automatically update the new and changed covers or do i have to manually delete and send those albums again?
You can add new covers by using the 'update metadata in iPod library' command on files listed by 'load library' but it's not possible to update covers already added currently.
QUOTE(radecke @ Dec 25 2007, 18:14)

and the other problem: i have sent two videos from two different folders with each different folder.jpgs as thumbs to the ipod, but when i browse them on my ipod they both have the same thumbnail.
It's related to sparse artwork on the new iPods, my handling of that falls over due to lack of metadata I guess, I'll fix that. Thanks for reporting.