Sorry I've been gone so long. Life occasionally gets in the way. Let me try to catch up on a few posts. :-)
bhoar, I'm going to have to address your posts separately. You've apparently been busy.

Give me a couple days to try to get back into the swing of things.
QUOTE(Cutestory @ Oct 20 2006, 18:50)

Yeah, I took the same CD and ripped it twice, the first time adding a colon to the album name and the second time removing it.
The first CD had the problem I described, the second CD ripped fine.
Then it's an issue with AutoFLAC trying to match up with EAC's undocumented renaming scheme. I'll experiment and try to figure out how to fix it.
QUOTE(vhroxu2 @ Oct 21 2006, 08:43)

Nitro - I couldn't get the beta to work for sh*t, so I downloaded the one from the website and guess what - IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM!!!!!!

Good deal. The version on the website now supersedes the beta, so as long as that works for you you're good to go.
QUOTE(RolloTomasi @ Oct 21 2006, 14:17)

Oops. Missed that. RTFM, I guess. Maybe on the next release, put that in caps or bold letters. No biggie, though.
Thanks for reporting this. As I said, I
attempted to explain it, but even as I wrote it I had doubts that it'd be obvious. I'll work on a better method for this, or improved documentation, in the next release.
QUOTE(RolloTomasi @ Oct 21 2006, 14:17)

I'm with Nakkis as I'd prefer not to have the preceding "00-" but, again, no biggie. One can always edit the file name.
I'll add an option for this in the next version. This would also apply to the variable naming scheme functionality, so I guess I should finish the job.

QUOTE(RolloTomasi @ Oct 21 2006, 14:17)

Also, if you want to keep the original WAV cue, be sure to copy it into the target folder before the rip process is complete.
Why would you want to keep the original CUE sheet in addition to the one converted by AutoFLAC? It's the exact same, just with the filename extensions renamed to .flac. It'd be easy to have AutoFLAC copy over the original .wav version in addition, but I'm not seeing the benefit. Can you explain?
QUOTE(RolloTomasi @ Oct 21 2006, 14:17)

What I was trying to say is that in the opening AutoFlac pop-up window, it is possible to check both boxes for "Test and Copy" and "Rip to Image." But since EAC does not support T&C for image creation it doesn't work that way. Again, no biggie.
Ok, I gotcha now. Until EAC adds support for this, I'll just gray out the T&C option in AutoFLAC if image mode is selected.
QUOTE(RolloTomasi @ Oct 21 2006, 14:17)

I've played around somewhat with the image naming scheme [though I would seldom use it myself]. Its not really clear how to set up these two parameters within EAC and the AutoFlac interface.
Like I said, I'll work on this some more for the next release. As I'm sure you're aware, this is the first release that includes variable naming support, so it's likely to have some rough edges. You've obviously already found a couple of them.
QUOTE(RolloTomasi @ Oct 21 2006, 14:17)

Here's a suggestion for the next version. In write mode, it would be nice to have no user input necessary after the extraction from FLAC to WAV.
I can explore that, but I'm a bit hesitant about trying to fully automate it. There are two main reasons the manual step in between is currently required:
1. Given that we're talking about burning instead of ripping, I'd rather the user have the opportunity to verify that all is correct before the disc starts burning. Otherwise, errors could be introduced, which in the best case would cost money and time to reburn the CD-Rs, and in the worst case would would not even be noticed (until you try to play back the CD at some later date).
2. A lot of CDs have data tracks along with the audio. If I'm burning one of those, then I'll want to include the data portion as well. EAC provides the option to either close the disc or leave the session open. In order to burn that data track, the audio session must be left open. This requires manual intervention.
Beyond that, it'd take a bit of time to code this properly and account for potential error messages. In this case, the time and risk involved in implementing the feature seems to outweigh the potential benefits. If this proves to be a popular request then I'll certainly look into it, but at this time it's not on my todo list.
QUOTE(audiomonkeyboy @ Oct 30 2006, 10:44)

I'm confused. In the NAME SCHEME filed in AutoFLAC, I have %I\%A\%C. This is correct or incorrect?
audiomonkeyboy, the documentation for this feature is somewhat poorly written at this time. I apologize for that. To set a baseline, please set AutoFLAC and EAC to this:
AutoFLAC:
Base directory - D:\Backup\CDs
Name scheme - %I\%A\%C
Image scheme - %A - %C
EAC:
Filename, Naming scheme - %I\%A\%C\%N-%T
Filename, Various artist naming scheme - %I\Various Artists\%C\%N-%A - %T
These are the default settings, as documented in the AutoFLAC readme. Using these settings, tracks should be ripped like so:
D:\Backup\CDs\Progressive\Dream Theater\Octavarium\01-The Root of All Evil.flac
CUE sheets should also be properly copied over:
D:\Backup\CDs\Progressive\Dream Theater\Octavarium\00-Octavarium.flac
That should get you started. Once its working with these settings, read the help info provided by the ? button next to the variable naming fields and experiment with other settings if you wish. If these settings do NOT work, however, please let me know.
RolloTomasi, thanks for helping out with this while I've been away.

QUOTE(audiomonkeyboy @ Oct 30 2006, 10:44)

Another question. Does multitasking while a cd is ripped/encoded have any effect on quality, or should I be doing other stuff while AutoFLAC is running?
bhoar and RolloTomasi both did a great job answering this question, but I figure I'll throw in my two cents as well. Assuming you have a decently fast system, then yes, you should be able to multitask while AutoFLAC is running. The conversion from WAV to FLAC will not be affected at all. The only real concern is the process of ripping the tracks from your CD to WAV files. Assuming you're not trying to access the CD at the same time you're ripping it, doing anything that's really processor intensive (eg, playing a 3D game), or doing anything really I/O intensive (eg, defragmenting your hard drive), then you should be fine.
I routinely multitask on my system, and haven't yet had a problem (that I noticed, anyway

). If you have a doubt, though, then it's certainly safer to leave it alone.