Question 1: With AutoEAC, I am having the same problem as Philaphonic
http://philaphonic.spymac.com/Error-01.png
You said that it was due to the naming schemes being different in AutoEAC and EAC. I actually cut and pasted the naming scheme directly from EAC into Auto EAC. They both are :%I\%A\%Y\%C\%N-%T
Am I doing this incorrectly? No cue is being written.
http://philaphonic.spymac.com/Error-01.png
You said that it was due to the naming schemes being different in AutoEAC and EAC. I actually cut and pasted the naming scheme directly from EAC into Auto EAC. They both are :%I\%A\%Y\%C\%N-%T
Am I doing this incorrectly? No cue is being written.
Verify that the Artist and Album names displayed in EAC exactly match the Artist and Album folder names. Sometimes Windows/EAC will name the folder differently than what is displayed. This can happen if there's an "invalid" (according to Windows) character in the filename, such as a '/', or it can happen if there's a trailing space after the name (which is frustratingly difficult to troubleshoot, believe me).
I'd suggest that you copy/paste the artist name from EAC and Windows Explorer into notepad, one below the other, then repeat with the album name. Verify character by character that they match. This is most likely your problem.
Question #2 This is my functionality request. If you could
A: allow the naming convention in AutoFLAC to be changeable,
B: allow encoding with Lame or other codecs as individual files (while still encoding the FLAC images) into a different directory at the same time.
C: make certain that all data tracks and hidden tracks are included in the image.
A: allow the naming convention in AutoFLAC to be changeable,
B: allow encoding with Lame or other codecs as individual files (while still encoding the FLAC images) into a different directory at the same time.
C: make certain that all data tracks and hidden tracks are included in the image.
I'm currently working on other projects at the moment, so no major features will be added anytime soon. I do still need to make a couple bug fixes, which I hope to do soon, but it'll be a maintanence release only. As for your specific requests:
A) This has been requested by a bunch of people, and while I'm not opposed to it, it would take a good bit of time to implement and test properly. I'd say this is on my long-term todo list, but I can't commit to any particular timeline for getting it done. AutoEAC already supports this, though, so if this is important to you I'd recommend you use that version.
B) I don't have any plans to add this capability. While I'm sure it would be convenient, the stated purpose of the program is to backup lossless copies. MP3, even if done as a duplicate, is simply outside of that scope and I'd rather not spend time implementing that functionality.
I think a better solution to this problem would be to use a script/program that can transcode your collection after the fact into any format you want. This way, as your musical needs or technical preferences change, it'd be very easy to simply delete the lossy copies and run the script again with different settings to create a new copy. I've already written such a script for my own collection, which I do plan on publishing to my software page after a few finishing touches, but it's designed for individual FLACs. I don't know how much work it'd be to modify it for FLAC images. I'm sure you can find other programs capable of doing this, though (foobar2000 comes to mind).
C) If you're talking about ripping to a FLAC image, then all hidden audio tracks will be included, even tracks hidden in track 01 index 00. If you choose to rip to individual tracks, then all hidden audio tracks except track 01 index 00 will be included. This is a technical limitation, though I'm trying to come up with a workaround for it.
Data tracks, however, cannot be embedded in a FLAC image. It's just not technically possible. If you prefer album images vs. individual tracks, then it may make sense to create an ISO image of the Data track vs. simply copying over the files like AutoFLAC does. Personally, I prefer having the individual files, as this makes it actually usable while sitting on my file server. However, if you want a true duplicate copy, an ISO image would be better, as you can ensure you maintain the volume title, etc.
ISO support, however, is another feature that I don't currently plan on adding to AutoFLAC. Think about it this way: if I was solely interested in making 100% accurate archive copies for no purpose other than to backup my CD collection, then I wouldn't even bother with AutoFLAC. I'd use CDRWin, or something similar, and make bit-by-bit images of the entire disc. This would be the most accurate solution to recreating identical copies, but I also want to be able to enjoy this material as well. If I'm giving up a couple hundred gigs of storage space, then I absolutely want to be able to browser through my collection and listen to any song or watch any bonus content that I'd like. With ISO or BIN/CUE images, that'd be simply impossible (or impractical at the very best).
Hope this helps.






