QUOTE(kanak @ Aug 3 2006, 04:32)

Hi Jebus
Thanks for your reply.
1. Sorry but i have another newbie question. I have an SSE capable processor. How do I use neroAacEnc_SSE2.exe instead of neroAACenc.exe ? Is renaming aacenc_sse2 to aacenc enough? (just want to know the official way to do this).
2. I got this "error" while configuring neroaacenc:

(i wasn't connected to the net, and the program was trying to access it, most probably to get album arts).
Are you planning to implement an option to turn off the "auto get" album art thing?
3. Also, i noticed a spelling mistake in "Start Conversion" dialog. It should read "hierarchy".
4. A Gripe regarding the "progress bars". At present, the progress bar moves only when it completes the task on the file it's working on (it jumps). Is it possible for you to implement two progress bars? (one representing progress on current task, and another representing the total progress -- like in foobar) I seriously thought my coumputer was hanged

5. Do you plan to include the ability to select "high quality" encoder engine setting for Lame?
6. Do you plan to include a "downmix to mono" option?
7. Feature Request: Queuing tasks. If you could add support for queuing, the program would be real powerful. E.g. It could be a "replacement" for Mareo and the like. We could select a bunch of files, and add a task to convert them to Flac/WavPack/etc, and then add another task to convert them to MP3/OGG. It'd be really awesome.
I thank you for your effort. Eagerly awaiting the next version (although i can make serious use of it only when WavPack support is implemented).
Thanks Mate!
1. Yes, renaming it should work fine since the commands and output should be identical. Haven't tried it though. I'll add that to the readme as well.
2. Wish I knew what was under the "details" button... is that Windows Vista? Haven't tried on it yet.
3. Thanks.
4. Agreed - see my response below.
5. No. High quality (-h, or -q 3) is already selected by default, and no one has proved any value in setting this higher.
6. Possibly, if people really want it.
7. Good idea. Definitely a post-1.0 idea though.
I'll add #3, #4, #6 and #7 to the bug tracker. Thanks for your feedback!
QUOTE(Klyith @ Aug 3 2006, 06:12)

QUOTE(kanak @ Aug 3 2006, 08:32)

4. A Gripe regarding the "progress bars". At present, the progress bar moves only when it completes the task on the file it's working on (it jumps). Is it possible for you to implement two progress bars? (one representing progress on current task, and another representing the total progress -- like in foobar) I seriously thought my coumputer was hanged

How does foobar do that anyways? Does it watch the console output of the encoder and scrape the percent done from that? That must have been annoying to code, you'd have to customize it for every encoder...
That's how it works, and it isn't too annoying (except that its broken - .NET is supposed to fire an event every time it receives a new line of output, but instead fires them all at once when some internal, undocumented buffer fills up... around 150 lines at once! So it would be jumpy and I disabled it for now).
I could use piped i/o, but then 2-pass encoders, and LAME VBR header writing wouldn't work.