Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: which downsampler is preferred
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Hydrogenaudio Forum > General Audio
robinpb
48khz -> 44.1khz

downsampling required, which of the following is preferred ('less' lossy) ?

1) ssrc_hp (1.30) --twopass --rate 44100 --bits 16 --dither 1 --pdf 1 1

2) fb2k: dsp -> resampler (ssrc - slow mode)

or is there an even better solution in fb2k >0.8.3 ?

must downsample. want optimal quality.
AndyH-ha
You don't want dither added unless you are reducing the bit depth, otherwise it is just more noise to no advantage.
SebastianG
Are you sure this is not required?
I'm not.
It may work without distortions but there's no guarantee, is there?

Edit: Just a guess: A rectangular dither might be appropriate and safe in this situation.
The noise floor will be 3dB lower compared to full triangular dither.

Edit2:
I just looked at SSRC's source code to check what it actually does concerning dithering and noise shaping.
Unfortunately "noise shaping" is called "dither" by the author.
CODE

--dither   SELECTS ACTUALLY A FIR NOISE SHAPING FILTER.
           "triangular spectral shape" corresponds to the
           filter with the impulse response [1 -1]

--pdf      SELECTS THE DITHER TYPE AND AMPLITUDE
           amplitude of 1 corresponds to "full dithering"


If however -- like kjoonlee pointed out -- you're interested in converting those to MP3 better use "ssrc --rate 44100 --bits 24". LAME can handle 24bit/sample files.
OR: Just use Foobar2K to transcode. It doesn't really matter what resampler you use. They're both good.
I totally agree to this reply and the following by kjoonlee you got in the other thread.
kjoonlee
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=48105

The next step will probably be MP3 encoding. I'd skip the 16-bit stage.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.