Did somebody can upload some files with real 96khz/48khz bandwith and 24/32 bit resolution, and same sample in 16bit 44khz, Because i want to hear that how sounds, what is differents.

Thanks

If you can hear a difference, you may be the only one.

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st&p=318436

You will have to convert it into 44100 Hz 16 bits by yourself, though.

There are some audio samples available on the website of Mytek, manufacturer of professional digital audio products: mytekdigital.com
(scroll down the page for 96 kHz samples)

I don't hear any different, but looks like audio have some cristality. I can't define that, something like more dinamic.

Thanks you guys for opening my eyes

You don't hear any different, but it has some cristality? Both 96 kHz and 44.1 kHz?

"looks like" as in 'I are making a light show with it?'

In the first look, i say woah, how good sound, same when i saw first H264 video in 1920x1080 resolution.

96khz have cristaly, and because i dont have such good equiptment, i don't see much different's in first time, but now ( after fiwe times) for example guitars sounds totaly different, better.

To be honest 96khz is aswome.

Btw, is there one more song?

Please read the Terms of Service focussing, mostly, on number 8. Then search for ABX and download some software to test your hypothesis.

OK then , show me results of abx test where compared 24bit/96khz vs 16bit/44khz, i will like to see that.

I said earlier, for me 96khz isn't much better now, but is better and that is my opinion, and i use foobar for abxing.

Admins, please close disscussion, i am get right answer, Thanks

I am so confused.

If you have ABXed you should post those results to show this difference you can hear (on your not "such good equiptment").

I think what people were trying to "open your eyes" to was that you won't be able to actually discern any difference with your ear. Thus the request for you to post ABX results showing otherwise.

Also, what is this term, "cristality"? Is it like woob music? <joking>

Is there a consensus on HA about how to ABX different sample rate formats ?
I can imagine that a fair setup would be to upsample the 16/44.1 file(s) to the higher format and compare at the higher rate. The reasoning is that upsampling (if done correctly) is transparent, downsampling isn't.