[quote name='bubbleguuum' date='Jan 22 2007, 18:03' post='466414']
[quote name='Xedecimal' post='466403' date='Jan 22 2007, 23:43']
Version Discogs Tagger - 0.92 - foo_discogs
BUG: if you attempt to write tags to release id of "726569" (bonkers 16), the first track of the 3 cds of this compilation ends up being ## - Various - <b>, the first item in this release should be an actual track name that you will see if you visit discogs.com in a browser and look that release up.
[/quote]
I knew of that small parsing bug which manifest in the rare case discs are named. However you can just use the delete button to remove those offending fake tracks.
[/quote]
As for deleting the offending tracks, the offending track is actually 01, so that leaves 01 as 02 and you gotta move them once again, one single item at a time down to line up, but then your first track out of each album usually ends up not matching the rest of the tracks.
[quote]
[quote]
BUG: Automatically match discogs tracks to local tracks, in the configuration seems to be completely random. Never has a single track actually matched, they usually just screw up the existing order of items that were good until the auto sorting randomized them. My solution to that is to just disable the auto-sorting, but if it worked better that would be awesome.
[/quote]
auto track matching is not very advanced : it will match tracks on track length if they exist. I've seen it fail in some case and will have a look. I've not spent much time on this as most people already have the tracks sorted in most case and it's tricky to get right (ie the more advanced the algorithm is there's some whole lot of cases when it will get it wrong).
[/quote]
As for the random matching, there's a whole crapload of methods...
http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/files/a...-matching.shtmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matchinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrephttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distanceThese may take time to include, and don't really come out with that much bang for their buck, but in case you get bored, I'd suggest soundex and levenshtein, those work wonderful, then just match to the highest percentage of success.
[quote]
[quote]
Feature Request: Synchronized scrolling, when re-ordering a large list of multiple cd albums I can find myself reorganizing these tracks on the left side for like an hour while trying to constantly keep the right side in sync. If it could scroll both sides simultaneously to keep them both in synch, that would be nice.
[/quote]
Agreed, it's a pain in the ass with multiple CD without this
[quote]
Feature Request: It would be absolutely marvelous if you could drag/drop the order on the left, I could re-order super fast that way. That is, to drag initially would select, second drag on a selection would move (much like the playlist view of foobar2k)
[/quote]
sounds useful
[quote]
Feature Request: If you're having trouble finding information on an mp3 that only has a title tag and a bad title of the filename like "Track 01.mp3" if you recently ripped it off one of your cds. Using the filename display on the right side of the tag writer can get pretty confusing, what seems like a somewhat easy method to re-do this would be to add a combobox or such that would let you pick for the right side "Filename", "%TITLE%", "%TITLE% - %TRACKNUMBER%" or better yet, just a text box that would use the existing foobar formatting to format the right side of this, then you could get around %ARTIST% with %ALBUM ARTIST% and %TRACKNUMBER% with %VINYL TRACK% or whatever another person suggested that they tag their vinyls by.
[/quote]
I think I understand what you mean but that seem a rare use case to me. I could use %title% which is an alias on $if2($meta(title),%_filename%), instead of just the filename.
[/quote]
I meant that if you could specify the actual TAGZ format string, you could adapt a series of strings to different methods of organization (sometimes I even gotta go by file path to get a series of tagless mp3s into a group)
[quote]
[quote]
Feature Request: This one sounds totally impossible. The namign convention of downloaded album art. Usually ends up to be like album_art.jpg, album_art_2.jpg, etc. If possibly you could name them what they actually are, cover.jpg, inset.jpg, back.jpg, cd1.jpg, cd2.jpg. Which at first I was thinking was impossible, but they usually have a consistant order. From the majority of lists I see in discogs, it usually goes front, cdX, back, inset. Or something along those lines. Probably a complete waste of time to even attempt but I'm putting it in here anyways, super low priority.
[/quote]
If discogs had a clear rule for this, that would be doable. In the meantime....
[quote]
I'm sure I had more at some point in time but this is all I can come up with off hand. I'll possibly post more later. Down with freedb, down with winamp, up with foobar, discogs and this badass plugin.
[/quote]
Thanks for you input!
[/quote]
I guess the biggest easiest feature that would be the most helpful to include, would be the ability to move multiple tracks simultaneously. Eg. if you select multiple items on the left side, then hit move up / move down. They won't budge, if this would move multiple items, it could really speed up the usability side of this plugin.
Sorry I sound picky, I'm just trying to give you some ideas on different directions you can go, the majority of these features I could care less if they even get incorporated but I'd think others might really enjoy these features.