QUOTE(~*McoreD*~ @ Apr 7 2008, 20:24)

When you say:
A wholly new box set would tag just fine as: 'artist - nameofboxset', using disc 1/3,2/3,3/3.
Do you mean you tag Artist field with 'artist - nameofboxset' ?
No, I like to keep the Artist tag as clean as possible. If it's an 'original' boxset, with albums unique to that release, the name of the boxset is perfectly usable as Album name. Unless someone decides to give different names to each disc, like cd1:diamonds, cd2:pearls, etc. I tend to ignore those, but when those names are usefully descriptive, it's a shame to lose them. Like we discussed earlier: Grouping is a way to get around this, pretty or not.
The only time when I monkey with a tag, is to put something else then 'Various' in the AlbumArtist field. I was getting too many of those, and changed a few really large sets of collections (e.g. Rough Guides and Alternative Times) into AlbumArtist: 'Various RG' and 'Various AT'. It's like Grouping, but a bit less polished. Otherwise, I'm quite conformist
Your points about the issues that come up when handling boxset-albumart are exactly what I'm currently dealing with. Do I remember correctly a screenshot you posted with a 50CD Elvis set? I've got that one coming up, so if you have any better ideas than to use Grouping, let me know, hehe.
My goal is to have my files to be as independent from any specific application as possible. As you can tell, I'm currently working on multi-cd albums and boxsets --- and it's a pain
One of the things that is surprisingly time-consuming is properly filling the disccount and discnumber tags when they're completely empty to begin with. I work in batches (mostly to be able to keep overview for myself but also to limit the damage if I really mess up) and am now using Foobar to fill those disccount/number tags.
For example, first I load all 2CD sets of the current batch in Foobar and tag the disccount '2', load the 3CD sets and tag them '3'. Then I load every 1st cd, to tag the discnumber '1'. And then on to 2 and 3.
Because there is no single system of organization on file-level (some are in subdirs cd1, cd2, disc1, A, B, others are in one dir but have filenames '201track..212track' instead of 'cd2/01track..cd2/12track' , etc etc), I don't see how this can be automated, but if you have a brilliant idea
Lastly, a little thing I noticed: on the tab Selected Tracks/Editor, the status for the checkbox 'Also rename the file to match the case' isn't remembered between sessions, whereas all others are.
Cheers, ...until next weekend, probably!
PS something quite different - one of the reasons I've been making my library (also) available in iTunes, is that most people are familiar with the program. Unlike Total Commander, WinAmp, Foobar or even MediaMonkey, about which I got complaints from visitors who wanted to browse and play. (I'm not going to mention WMP, I hate hate hate that). Trouble is, iTunes doesn't have a Read-Only mode, aka Party Mode. So my idea of preventing problems by offering a well-known program for drunken revelers is backfiring a bit. Yes, they can actually control it, but the problem is, they can actually control it... Since I don't want to have a Killing (tag-)Fields, I would jump for joy if you found a way for iTSfv to put iTunes in some kind of read-only mode. I don't care about the library (easily backupped or rebuilt), only about the actual music files.
Locking the entire PC, except for iTunes, would be just fine. We're not talking hack-proof, but just a way to protect people who think they're being hilariously funny, from my wrath.