QUOTE (bryant @ Feb 20 2007, 08:03)

Well, you're getting significantly more downloads per day than I am, so I wouldn't worry about a flood from me adding a link! Several of your supported formats are more popular than WavPack, so that's probably the majority.
Anyway, if you want me to wait I am happy to do that!

David
Totally off-topic, but hey

I think you're totally underestimating your work...
Today, WMPTSE is mainly used by educated users. The simple fact to be able to understand that you NEED WMPTSE implies that you know what tags are...which is not the majority of people.
I would say, as i am confronted with their bug report that WavPack has a strong 20% share of this population.
FLAC having 30%, Vorbis ~20% (i doesn't support writing under messy vorbis) and MPEG4 25%. The rest being APE compatible codecs (MPC+APE...).
[it is not statistics, it is based on PM message i received when a bugs occurs, bug report, forum help request, mail report and so on...it may be biased by the care from the user with the format, which in a way is better (quantity vs quality ?)]
I think by considering the statistic you get on your website, you're forgetting that ~90% of users (even educated) are using Windows, and a good 50% (at least) is using WMP or other DirectShow player. Then they don't use your codebase directly, but mainly directshow codec derivatives...
You're wider than you think

For the rest, as i said before, i do WMTPSE on my free time.
So whether it's successful or not is not really my point.
If YOU think it could help WV in any way to have WMPTSE mentioned on wavpack.com, do it !!!
Otherwise, i will not moan or groan
I am perfectly happy with WavPack, even if its roots are lazyier than me

Back on topic, Toff seems to be HAdead since Aug 12 2005, but seems like he's french (source point on a free.fr mail address). I may be able to contact him.
MaB_fr
P.S. : you even get 25% on HA
2006 Codec Pool