QUOTE(pepoluan @ Apr 12 2007, 09:05)

We have been front-row spectators of the birth and ascent of a new lossless audio compression format, the Tom's Audio Kompressor (TAK).
I think we ought to give TAK its own forum, to record the early discussions, and to record its subsequent development.
As it is now, TAK's threads got buried between other threads.
Thank you very much for caring!
But...
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Apr 12 2007, 09:19)

Currently, if you look at the
Lossless / Other Codecs forum, it pretty much
is the TAK forum. I don't think that it's that difficult to find the threads.
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Apr 12 2007, 10:07)

TAK is getting a lot of discussion as it is in a key phase.
I would also point out that the post to thread ratio is low; i.e.: there are many threads, but not that many posts - especially if you exclude "W00t! Thanks!" posts. All the threads are new releases, which can't last forever; no-one is asking support questions, which are the types of thread that will keep a forum ticking over.
Good points!
Somehow i would feel forced to fill a dedicated TAK forum with content, if nobody else is posting... One downside is, that even a temporary lack of posts regarding TAK makes some people feel, that TAK is dying. There have already been exapmles in other threads for this.
If more people start asking questions about TAK's usage, we possibly should think again about it.
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Apr 12 2007, 14:26)

QUOTE(pepoluan @ Apr 12 2007, 13:48)

Maybe by giving its own forum we will help push its development and deployment?
But is it fair that TAK should be given that help? FLAC and WavPack had to work
years for the 'honour'. I
sincerely hope that we
do see a TAK forum on Hydrogen Audio, but only when it has
earned it.
I agree, this wouldn't be fair.
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Apr 12 2007, 09:19)

I think creating a separate forum for TAK at this time is a little 'disrespectful' to FLAC and WavPack, who have worked hard to achieve the user-base that they have, which is one hell of a lot more people than TAK.
But please don't take only the time into account when judging the effort which went into the development of a compressor. Possibly TAK's first year of (public) development can count as two or even three...
Thomas