Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Lame in mono
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - General
djaage
I have done some test in Adobe audition with lame setting in 192cbr mono vs wma 320 Stereo





JensRex
Spectrograms are useless for comparing/evaluating audio quality. You don't hear with your eyes.

The End.
Axon
When you have more bitrate per channel, the lowpass goes up. Gee, what a surprise.

To answer your question: no.
Martin F.
192 kbps mono vs. 192 kbps stereo? Of course the quality for a given bitrate can be better if there’s only one channel to encode.
2Bdecided
1st post. Newbie or troll?

For either, please see the FAQ.

Cheers,
David.
djaage
QUOTE(JensRex @ Jul 26 2007, 16:06) *

Spectrograms are useless for comparing/evaluating audio quality. You don't hear with your eyes.

The End.


I agree with that but i was just wondering ? Thanks

QUOTE(2Bdecided @ Jul 26 2007, 16:27) *

1st post. Newbie or troll?

For either, please see the FAQ.

Cheers,
David.



I'm a troll that getting confused with all these codecs and settings.

Since i have a lot of mp3 i wonder how to get them equal in sound.

At the moment i'm looking into this software: www.platinumnotes.com

Danimal
QUOTE(djaage @ Jul 26 2007, 11:24) *

QUOTE(JensRex @ Jul 26 2007, 16:06) *

Spectrograms are useless for comparing/evaluating audio quality. You don't hear with your eyes.

The End.


I agree with that but i was just wondering ? Thanks

QUOTE(2Bdecided @ Jul 26 2007, 16:27) *

1st post. Newbie or troll?

For either, please see the FAQ.

Cheers,
David.



I'm a troll that getting confused with all these codecs and settings.

Since i have a lot of mp3 i wonder how to get them equal in sound.

At the moment i'm looking into this software: www.platinumnotes.com


I have some beachfront property in Nebraska to sell you, and a nice bridge in Brooklyn.
djaage
QUOTE(Danimal @ Jul 26 2007, 17:54) *

QUOTE(djaage @ Jul 26 2007, 11:24) *

QUOTE(JensRex @ Jul 26 2007, 16:06) *

Spectrograms are useless for comparing/evaluating audio quality. You don't hear with your eyes.

The End.


I agree with that but i was just wondering ? Thanks

QUOTE(2Bdecided @ Jul 26 2007, 16:27) *

1st post. Newbie or troll?

For either, please see the FAQ.

Cheers,
David.



I'm a troll that getting confused with all these codecs and settings.

Since i have a lot of mp3 i wonder how to get them equal in sound.

At the moment i'm looking into this software: www.platinumnotes.com


I have some beachfront property in Nebraska to sell you, and a nice bridge in Brooklyn.



Nebraska here i come....


xmixahlx
everyone knows that encoding music is a lengthy process:

rip cd
convert to mono
look at a fancy graph (delete and repeat if it looks silly)
convert to 24bit for better quality (duh)
encode to mp3 128kbps for transparency


later
Ojay
QUOTE(xmixahlx @ Jul 26 2007, 19:10) *

everyone knows that encoding music is a lengthy process:

rip cd
convert to mono
look at a fancy graph (delete and repeat if it looks silly)
convert to 24bit for better quality (duh)
encode to mp3 128kbps for transparency
later

You forgot to mention resampling to a higher frequency bandwidth (higher! - wider! - better! more dope!!!)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.