killakid
Jan 13 2003, 03:56
Hi,
I was encoding the new Rolling Stones compilation, Forty Licks, and let EAC run alone while I was out.
When I came back home I noticed that some tracks had bitrates around 127, 129 even though I used, as usual, lame 3.90.2 with APS.
I looked through them with Encspot and found that over 90% of the frames were encoded at 128.
Any idea?
Compilation? Maybe these songs are mono and/or have a low frequency cutoff. Have a look in EAC's wav editor.
-Nepomuk-
Jan 13 2003, 05:09
Right!
Many of the first stones recordings (at the beginning of the cd) are mono. i've encoded the cd with mpq quality 5 and got a few songs with less than 90kb's B) . so apd will do a good job
Same here... Did that record with MPC --extreme and the bitrates often fell very low. So, nothing to worry about.
killakid
Jan 14 2003, 03:30
Thanks a lot.
I tried to encode the suspect tracks once again and obtained the same result.
They sound fine anyhow, so you're likely to be right.
BTW, I thought that the cds contained remastered versions of the songs.
Nothing to complain if people rips them, if they try to sell the lp at 35 euro (in Italy) with 35 years old recordings...
_Shorty
Jan 14 2003, 12:42
there are some mono tracks on that album, yes. I actually took those particular tracks and dropped the right channel to get a mono wav and encoded them with --alt-preset standard -b80, per Dibrom's advice on mono tracks. They're a bit smaller than the normal --aps tracks since they're not stereo and because their lowend limit is 80kbps instead of 128
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.