QUOTE(Woodinville @ Mar 4 2008, 10:50)

It's been my experience lately that information in peer-reviewed journals that are not electronically available is regarded as nonexistant, both in terms of citations for new papers and in places like Wikipedia, where if it's not on the net, it doesn't exist.
There is a wealth of information that is simply being ignored, and more than a bit of the ignorance seems to be both deliberate and steadfast, i.e. "If I can't find it on the web, it doesn't exist".
You are right, and it's very sad. The reason that non-electronic resources are often ignored is that finding and managing electronic resources is extremely easy, whereas finding and managing paper resources effectively is fairly difficult. I have about 400 digital papers, which I can find easily, manage easily, search easily, etc. I have about 100 paper papers, which are hard to find (even with well indexed files), hard to have multiple copies (one for home and one for work), impossible to search, etc.
While there is a wealth of knowledge on paper that can't be ignored, the right solution is to digitize (with OCR) these papers as soon as possible. The wrong solution and is to stamp our feet and say "kids these days don't know how to use a library." Having said that, it's equally (if not more so) important that we archive paper copies of all electronic resources.