If I want to decode a MP3 file encoded with LAME 3.90.2 or 3.92, shall I decode to .wav with 3.90.2 for the file encoded with 3.90.2 and decode the 3.92 encoded with 3.92? Are there any differences in the decoding engines in these two releases? I use the RazorLame interface.
Thanks!
Full Version: Decoding to .wav!
QUOTE(THEI @ Jan 23 2003 - 07:59 PM)
If I want to decode a MP3 file encoded with LAME 3.90.2 or 3.92, shall I decode to .wav with 3.90.2 for the file encoded with 3.90.2 and decode the 3.92 encoded with 3.92? Are there any differences in the decoding engines in these two releases? I use the RazorLame interface.
Thanks!
Thanks!
There is no difference at all. They use identical mpglib libraries.
ok! Thanks!
But are there differences in the decoding engines in the .exe- and .dll-version?
But are there differences in the decoding engines in the .exe- and .dll-version?
But of course! The exe version has been substantially rewritten!
(Just kidding, OK )
(Just kidding, OK
)
QUOTE(THEI @ Jan 23 2003 - 09:59 PM)
ok! Thanks!
But are there differences in the decoding engines in the .exe- and .dll-version?
But are there differences in the decoding engines in the .exe- and .dll-version?
I assume you're still talking about LAME? The lame_enc.dll does not include the mpglib libraries, it has no decoding capability.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.