Synthetic Soul has updated his lossless
comparison.
Some comments:
The compression advantage over V1.0.2 is less than 0.01 percent while it is on average more than 0.05 percent for my sample sets. No big surprise for me, because Synthetic Soul's sample set isn't very TAK friendly. His files mostly don't benefit from more than 16 predictors, while TAK can use up to 256. Since the improvements in V1.0.3 usually affect files with high predictor orders the advantage here is very small.
Decoding is now significantly faster. Up to -p2e TAK is decoding faster than FLAC -8.
Synthetic Soul has also provided a comparison with FLAC and it's
MD5 check disabled.
Even under this condition TAK -p0 is decoding only slightly slower than FLAC -8. I am confident, that later versions of TAK will close this small gap. For instance the prediction filter contains a couple of instructions, which are now obsolete and could be removed, if i hadn't to care for backwards compatibility.
Surprisingly even encoding got faster, although i haven't performed any optimizations! Possibly the modification of the window function of the predictor, which is also responsible for the tiny compression improvements, affects the choice of the predictor count: Less predictors = more speed.