QUOTE
Originally posted by Fallen Guru
Sorry for the newbie question but what are the differences between the official LAME release, the mitiok release and the Dibrom release? Is it just encoding speed or also features / presets / tuned details?
Up until now I've just been using the latest released official LAME sources and compiled them on one of the Linux boxes... any reason to switch?
Regards
Fallen Guru
The differences between my compiles and mitiok's is that my compiles use a few flags which result in a faster executable (and require a 686 equivalent or newer processor), though the encoded files average out to be 5kbps larger with --alt-presets. There should be no
real quality issues, however there has been one occasion where I've noticed a very slight difference in quality on the infamous fatboy clip. In this case, my compile sounded a slight bit better, resulting in a little bit less pre-echo. Most probably this was because of the slightly higher bitrate. All of the --alt-preset testing in the past has been done with my versions of the compiles.
So in summary, there should be no real difference in quality. However, if you're extra paranoid, use my compile (3.90.2).
Btw, if anyone wants to make a newer compile in the same fashion I did, I've included in the makefile I used with the 3.90.2 binary along with instructions on how the compile was made. Compiler used was ICL 4.5.