KikeG is right. None of the so called 'objective' sound quality assessment tools that try to model how human hearing works are a good substitute for subjective listening tests.
What complicates the issue even more that a lot of human hearing (esp. neural processing) is relatively unknown for complex sounds.
Most of the dual stimulus sensory evaluation methodologies have been developed for olfactory senses and as such may not offer the lowest amount of test noise, because hearing works differently from taste/smell (on the neurological level).
But if you want to try, get a program that helps with doing a basic subjective listening tests:
http://ff123.net/abchr/abchr.htmlOf course, using a utility isn't the same as knowing how to set up a proper psychoacoustic listening test with properly controlled variables.
You can get more information from the following ITU-R Recommendations that help with some of the basics of subjective listening evaluation:
BS.1116
Methods for the subjective assessment...
BS.1283
Subjective assessment of sound quality...
BS.1284
Methods for the subjective assessment of sound...
BS.1285
Pre-selection methods for the subjective assessment...
BS.1387
Method for objective measurements of perceived audio quality
Please be advised that each reprint costs costs c. 22 CHF, but a local technical university library might have a license through which you could peruse the publications for free.
You can order the ITU papers online at:
http://www.itu.int/rec/recommendation.asp?...parent=R-REC-bsBest regards,
Halcyon