Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: EAC V0.99 prebeta 4 released
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Hydrogenaudio Forum > Validated News
greynol
Andre Wiethoff has just released an update to EAC. Announcement.

Changes:
  • The installer lets the user choose which components (e.g. FLAC or CDRDAO) he wants to install
  • Replacement with newer Accurate Rip DLL, FLAC Executable and the WMA Encoder Script
  • Added two more languages to the installer
  • Fixed the AccurateRip log info, where something is exactly 10
  • Fixed a crash on detecting gaps for silence on mixed mode CDs
  • Fixed the wrong export of the flag %F of the entire database to DB Text
  • Probably something else ;)
You can find a link for the download at the official EAC site:
http://exactaudiocopy.de/en/index.php/resources/download/
m_l
Thank You
urak
QUOTE(greynol @ Jan 31 2008, 02:08) *

- Replacement with newer Accurate Rip DLL, FLAC Executable and the WMA Encoder Script
- Added two more languages to the installer
- Fixed the AccurateRip log info, where something is exactly 10
- Fixed a crash on detecting gaps for silence on mixed mode CDs
- Fixed the wrong export of the flag %F of the entire database to DB Text
- Probably something else wink.gif

Relative paths ("external compression" section) still not supported? wacko.gif
greynol
If you explain what you mean by that, I'm sure someone here can help you.

As for your choice of smiley, I'd say you're projecting. wink.gif laugh.gif
hybridfan
Great news biggrin.gif
hlloyge
Nice, thank you.
exec
Thanks for the info.
As I can see, some EAC wiki articles have to be changed slightly. biggrin.gif
Borisz
"Process WAV" option causes an Unhandled Exception once you exit from it (regardless if you just cancel the file selection or actually do something and exit later). It says "Unhandled Exception at Options.264 -> INDEX-RANGE". Happened in all the 99 prebetas.

It also resets the options for whatever was the selected cd drive at the moment. Very annoying.
greynol
QUOTE(Borisz @ Jan 31 2008, 10:42) *
"Process WAV" option causes an Unhandled Exception once you exit from it (regardless if you just cancel the file selection or actually do something and exit later). It says "Unhandled Exception at Options.264 -> INDEX-RANGE". Happened in all the 99 prebetas.
I cannot confirm this problem, but feel free to report any problems over at the official support forum. They're a lot less likely to get any attention if posted here.

QUOTE(Borisz @ Jan 31 2008, 10:42) *
It also resets the options for whatever was the selected cd drive at the moment. Very annoying.
Are you switching back and forth between V0.95 and V0.99? Locations for drive information in the registry have changed since V0.95. I've yet to hear about such an issue from anyone else.
urak
QUOTE(greynol @ Jan 31 2008, 18:07) *

If you explain what you mean by that, I'm sure someone here can help you.


"Compression Options" --> "External Compression" --> "Program, including path, used for compression":

Absolute path (Eac's current behaviour) example: G:\Apps\Audio\Codecs\Flac\flac.exe

Now, I would like to insert the relative path (but eac doesn't accept), useful for portability (usb pen drive, etc.), example:
.\flac.exe
or
.\external_codecs\flac.exe
or
..\audio_codecs\Flac\flac.exe

etc.

In this way, you are not bound to specific letter drive/partition.

bye2.gif
greynol
QUOTE(urak @ Jan 31 2008, 20:11) *
"Compression Options" --> "External Compression" --> "Program, including path, used for compression"
Thank you.

I was thinking you wanted to configure different destination folders based on the compression format that you use (eg. c:\mp3\... and c:\flac\...).

QUOTE(urak @ Jan 31 2008, 20:11) *
Now, I would like to insert the relative path (but eac doesn't accept), useful for portability (usb pen drive, etc.), example:
.\flac.exe
or
.\external_codecs\flac.exe
or
..\audio_codecs\Flac\flac.exe

First of all, since EAC uses the registry I don't think there was ever an intention to make it portable, so it doesn't surprise me that your request wasn't considered. This doesn't mean that EAC can't be made portable, or at least to a certain extent (automatic integration of AccurateRip may very well be impossible on multiple systems, for example).

In terms of relative paths for external encoders this can be done without modifying EAC. If you plan on making EAC portable, you're probably running some type of script to import registry settings prior to launching EAC and it should be relatively simple to enter the drive letter and path to the registry directly as part of the process.
lipidicman
Will this install over 99pb3 without any problems?
urak
QUOTE(greynol @ Feb 1 2008, 06:46) *

so it doesn't surprise me that your request wasn't considered.

That's not my post (but i read it two weeks ago) ohmy.gif

QUOTE(greynol @ Feb 1 2008, 06:46) *
This doesn't mean that EAC can't be made portable,

Infact I'm using a true portable Eac (0.99 prebeta 3), i virtualized it using a sw virtualizing sys (works flawlessly and i'm virtualizing dbpoweramp, i hate sw that write to registry or to sys folders like %userprofile%, %appdata%, etc.), so that's because I've been looking for relative paths support.

btw, thanks
spoon
I would not be surprised if Windows v7 (or the one after) does not virtualize each program and keep it on their own sand box and you set which files are shared between programs, it would be end game for viruses.
Borisz
QUOTE(greynol @ Jan 31 2008, 20:56) *

QUOTE(Borisz @ Jan 31 2008, 10:42) *
"Process WAV" option causes an Unhandled Exception once you exit from it (regardless if you just cancel the file selection or actually do something and exit later). It says "Unhandled Exception at Options.264 -> INDEX-RANGE". Happened in all the 99 prebetas.
I cannot confirm this problem, but feel free to report any problems over at the official support forum. They're a lot less likely to get any attention if posted here.

QUOTE(Borisz @ Jan 31 2008, 10:42) *
It also resets the options for whatever was the selected cd drive at the moment. Very annoying.
Are you switching back and forth between V0.95 and V0.99? Locations for drive information in the registry have changed since V0.95. I've yet to hear about such an issue from anyone else.

I think I did a clean install, and I havent used 095 ever since 099 came out (better logfile).

Could somebody please post this over the EAC forums, I couldn't register there the last time I tried.
Qushak
A little offtopic:
Which version of EAC is now recommended?
paulgj
QUOTE(lipidicman @ Feb 1 2008, 03:50) *

Will this install over 99pb3 without any problems?


Did for me biggrin.gif
ArtMustHurt
i wish EAC would allow non normal characters in the cue sheet (in the track name)
how come its prebeta...why not just have it beta or is it too "buggy" to be beta yet? prebeta 3 work very well for me biggrin.gif
JunkieXL
Thanks for the sharing the info. I've been a little out of the loop of late, since I just had a kid and my job has turned into a 60+ hour a week nightmare...

I'm still using EAC .95 b3 from back in 2005

Could someone please give me a brief explanation of the major changes?

I mainly use EAC w/ REACT (which I probably also need to update) for creating FLAC files for playback and archival purposes and MP3's with LAME for my portable uses.

Thanks!
JXL
ckjnigel
I recall that one feature was removed way back when because of RIAA pressure.
But, I don't remember what that feature was -- can somebody refresh my memory?
nykobing
QUOTE(ckjnigel @ Feb 11 2008, 17:12) *

I recall that one feature was removed way back when because of RIAA pressure.
But, I don't remember what that feature was -- can somebody refresh my memory?



It is mentioned here.

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=41638
JunkieXL
Yeah, those comments about not being able to rip copy protected material was one of the main reasons I didn't update EAC a couple of years ago. Then I lost the time to properly research updates.

I'm guessing the current suggestion is keep older copies of EAC around for a just in case need and continue updating to the current releases?
JXL
rohangc
What does the following line from the changelog mean?

CODE
Fixed the AccurateRip log info, where something is exactly 10


I ripped all my CDs using the previous release. Should I be worried?
greynol
QUOTE(rohangc @ Mar 5 2008, 20:26) *
What does the following line from the changelog mean?

CODE
Fixed the AccurateRip log info, where something is exactly 10
If there is exactly ten of something in the AccurateRip portion of the log file, it will display the number 0 without the leading 1. Apparently this only got fixed for the status dialog and not for the log but should be fixed in the next release.

Here:
http://www.digital-inn.de/131752-post9.html

QUOTE(rohangc @ Mar 5 2008, 20:26) *
I ripped all my CDs using the previous release. Should I be worried?
No.
rohangc
Oh, okay!

Thanks greynol! biggrin.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.