QUOTE(UrbanVoyeur @ Mar 3 2008, 05:44)

SDHC is available at up to 32 GB to day and can go up to 2048 GB. So yes, there is room for expansion above today's fixed flash players, but at a high cost. In two or 3 years the 32 GB card will not be as expensive, but then the player itself will be significantly behind the tech curve and fairly worn.
8GB and 16GB cards are fairly reasonably priced, though. I think one or two of those plus a player with at least 8GB built in should get me started.
I scanned through my hard drive and found a little bit of the music I plan to put on the player (some of it I still have to rip, or I may have it on DVD backups (and off the hard drive)). I enqueued it in Winamp, and the play time is just about 100 hours. This is less than half to one quarter of what I would immediately put on the player. If you start counting audio I still have yet to transfer from audio CD / cassette / vinyl / etc, the playtime explodes by several decimal places, if not more. And, I haven't even figured out the video yet (There probably won't be as much playtime for the video as for the audio, though), but that, when I get around to getting it ready to go on the player, is going to take a significant chunk of space.
And, as for the audio, I probably won't be using less than 160kbps (or maybe 128kbps in the case of a superb encoder, if it's transparent compared to the original uncompressed master, or where the source material is such poor quality that 128kbps would be the uncompressed equivalent bitrate), and could see myself using 320kbps, FLAC, Monkey's, or even WAV.
For video quality, I can't stand the highly compressed videos I often see online, with painfully obvious artifacts. I'd prefer ones that are indistinguishable from the uncompressed original, unless you're a professionally trained videophile scrutinizing the videos frame by frame, and each frame pixel by pixel.
Ok... so I maybe exaggerated a
little bit on the video quality requirement, but I DO want at least an equivalent quality video (compared to the uncompressed master) as 192 to 256kbps mp3 is to uncompressed CD-quality wave, for my video content.
Estimated video playtime, for starters, though, will probably be around 30 to 40 hours or so. (Also, I'll need to get a good capture card for my computer so I can archive some older VHS tapes. Is there anything good quality that will work with a Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H mobo, Athlon 64 X2 4000+ CPU, 2GB RAM, currently onboard ATI X1250 video, Windows XP Home, for under $30? Then there's the question of whether my recently acquired 750GB hard drive will be enough to house all the content (uncompressed / losslessly compressed masters) I will be eventually putting on there.)
QUOTE(UrbanVoyeur @ Mar 3 2008, 05:44)

You could get a CF based player and get up to a very expensive 32 or 64 GB, but could probably buy 3 players for the cost of one of those cards. Less than that and there is no size advantage over a 16 GB fixed memory player.
Also, except for high end cameras, CF flash is on it's way out as a format, so your choices are limited.
Until a few years ago, for upgrading my digital camera, I was requiring CF. Now that it's obvious that no one (in the non-dSLR category) is using that format anymore, AND prices have come down significantly compared to when I first bought flash cards around 2003 or so, I also will use SD cards. I still won't consider xD or MS, mainly due to them being more proprietary, or SM (although I had a low capacity mp3 player/recorder a few years ago that used them) due to only going up to 128MB, and pretty much being dead as a format.
QUOTE(UrbanVoyeur @ Mar 3 2008, 05:44)

My $0.02 - get an 8-16 GB flash player with no expansion slot and a built in Li battery for $200 or less. Get some good headphones and expect 3 years of life from the player. After that, both you and the player will be ready for an upgrade.
If I'm getting such low (non-expandable) capacity with a non-replaceable battery, I may want to upgrade in 3 months, not years. (Also, $200 is an outrageous price to pay for something like that, unless it has a TON of high-end features AND will survive ANY abuse a human is physically capable of dishing out.)
One reason I want a replaceable battery is so that if the one in the player dies, and I want to continue listening (and can't charge it right then), I'll just swap the battery and continue using the player, like I've done with every audio device (except my cell phone) I've used up till now. (Then when I have the opportunity (hopefully before my spare dies), I'll charge the main battery in a separate charger.)
My current headphones are Panasonic RP-HT355 - $30 when they were available. They've been discontinued for a while now, and I've already had to repair them once or twice (as well as I'm on my 6th to 8th pair in the last 3 years or so) so I'll need to start looking for something to replace them. I figure I should start looking now, so I don't have to make an impulse-buying panic decision, which I am probably unfortunately going to have to make with an mp3 player, as I have nothing now.
But ONLY 3 years of life? I hope you mean 3 years of being "current / cutting-edge technology", not 3 years "until the player starts acting up, or breaks"! If you mean the latter, I'd prefer at least 1, if not 2, 0"s be added to the right of the 3.
QUOTE(UrbanVoyeur @ Mar 3 2008, 05:44)

Ed. note:
I corrected info about SDHC capacity, but still believe the price/performance edge lies with fixed capacity players.
(In quoting the post, I edited out the struck-out segment.)
I'll probably be putting close to 200-300 hours of music (at least 160-320kbps) on my player for starters, and maybe 5-8 hours of video (until I get a capture card).
To get the other content, though, I'll need to get some better playback (and probably recording equipment). My current sound and video is onboard (mobo is Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H) - sound is Realtek ALC889A, video is ATI Radeon Xpress 1250.
Obviously I'll need a video capture card for the videos, but I'm also wondering if our current VCRs and tape decks could use an upgrade. I'll want to get as good of a quality off them as possible, preferably as good as the original master was when it was new. (whether this means using a tape deck with XLR outputs, on-the-fly adjustable (while it's playing) azimuth, dual capstans, using a head cleaner between each recording of a cassette, adjusting the tension on the tapes, etc, or whatever, I want to get as good of a quality as possible. I'll want to destroy the originals after I have them permanently archived (somewhere other than the computer's internal hard drive, but I'm thinking media that's capable of holding at least several hundred, if not thousand, uncompressed audio tapes on each media, and that's good for long-term (like 50-100 years) storage.)
However, I don't exactly want to go overboard on my audio quality - if it wasn't there originally, I'm not getting it back. For example, it'd be a huge waste to sample at 192kHz, 32-bit, 6 channels, when the source material is so bad that 5kHz audio is down -240dB, it has only a 10dB dynamic range, and the stereo separation is 0.001°. However, I will probably, at first, record each tape/LP at the maximum quality my equipment is capable of. Then, I'll want to do some tests on it, and losslessly compress it to a more appropriate quality level.
As for upgrading the VCR, cassette deck & turntable, I'll have to wait at LEAST a few months if not more to do ANYTHING with it at all, and if I have to spend more than $100 apiece or $200 total, it might be more like a few years before I can afford anything. In no case, though, do I want to spend upper level x00's into the x,000's of $ for the equipment. Also if I spend more than a few hundred $, I'll want to be able to record from several tapes/LPs/etc simultaneously so I can save some time. (But, then, there's the long and tedious task of ID3 tagging the hundreds of thousands if not millions or tens of millions of songs...)
In the meantime, considering the on-board sound, and my tape players: Panasonic RQ-SW20 (portable walkman-style cassette), Sony TC-FX420R & TC-W550, and Technics RS-B11W, and turntable: Sony PS-242, is it good enough for getting archival-quality "masters" from my old tapes? I suspect it's not. For example, using my portable Panasonic tape player, a lot of tapes sound better if I hold them a certain way in the player. Also, they often sound better the first couple seconds after starting playing, even if I stop and restart from a different spot, or after rewinding/fast forwarding, then resuming play. And, many of my tapes sound MUCH better on the portable Panasonic than the home stereo Sony and Technics units I mentioned.
Then, there's the question of proper tape playback speed. Yes, I realize that some of the tapes I'll record (which were not necessarily high-level professionally produced, and in some cases were homemade) probably were recorded at the wrong speed, but for the ones that WERE done properly, I would like the player to play them at the proper speed so I won't have to make the adjustment in software later. (Or, an adjustable speed player might be ok, too.) And, for the tapes that I
KNOW were played at improper speeds, I can adjust the speed accordingly. I'd check the pitch on the piano (the vast majority of these have pianos in the recordings), assuming the piano was relatively in tune, on the recording, against what it's supposed to be, with a device I have (Sanderson Accu-Tuner, which I use as an aid in tuning pianos) that's capable of ±0.005¢ accuracy in pitch detection (100 cents is the typical distance between two adjacent notes on a piano (C to C#, C# to D, etc). (Would the flutter on even the best tapes ever made be bad enough as to make checking pitch for that fine of an accuracy be a moot point?)
(Not sure exactly how to word this correction, but I'd probably be better off checking the pitch of the player using a professionally recorded audio tape with test tones at certain pitches, as the Accu-Tuner basically works by listening to single notes (or harmonics of single notes), not complex harmonies.)
Also, for now, a hard drive player (unless it has a removable hard drive without voiding the warranty, in which case I'd use a CF or SD to IDE (or SATA) adapter, AND can survive repeated drops from several feet while it is operating) is out. I should probably restrict myself to flash players for now, due to my general clumsiness (but considering the content I'd want to eventually put on there (even if it takes me a year or more to get it done) and the quality I would like it encoded at, even several terabytes of hard drive space doesn't even begin to scratch the surface. I guess I have to sacrifice somewhere, though...