QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Mar 25 2008, 04:23)

I've been holding off saying this; however, following your last post, I feel torn to ask whether you have heard of REACT? IN conjunction with EAC, AlbumArt XUI and Tag you could rip with album art and create an M3U using EAC quite easily.
I've heard of REACT, though to be honest have absolutely no clue as to what it's for, really... Right now, I think I have sort of a system all figured out just from experimenting w/ all of this. If there's a more efficient method though, please let me know. As for now, this is what I'm doing as we speak in regards too; ripping/encoding, tagging, obtaining album art, creating M3U lists, documenting possible errors, and playing back files:
Dbpoweramp - Rip/encode, tag, extract album art, and catalogue albums.
EAC - Document/record .txt regarding possible errors through
Accuraterips data base.
WMP - Create M3U lists and for playback purposes.
Again, if there's a better (more accurate/faster) way in doing all of this please let me know:)
Quality is of the highest concern w/ me. I want to be sure that all of my original (purchased) LPCM copies are being transferred and stored via computer correctly - both being 100% identical to one another.
QUOTE(evereux @ Mar 25 2008, 04:43)

QUOTE(Aaron5604 @ Mar 24 2008, 20:39)

Thanx, does dbpoweramp rip as accurately as EAC does?
Yes.
QUOTE(Aaron5604 @ Mar 24 2008, 20:39)

Foobar and WMP both gave me this "6 repeated/different samples" error.
Offset issue? If so this isn't related to quality of extraction.
What's an "offset" issue? IE: I see this +- db "offset" option though have no clue as to what it means exactly.
Also, in addition to all of this... do any of you find it really necessary in using EAC's extensive features to insure the quality of each song you rip? Or, is all of that for mostly analytical purposes in understanding the details, should you decide to manipulate the file outside in how it was originally recorded by the artist?