Nero is indeed paying a flat fee for the license to distribute the AAC encoder and decoder (that BTW both have absolutely nothing in common with FAAC and FAAD2).
It seems that the last couple of years distribution of AAC binaries on small scale and without attempt to make profit (with free players for example) hasn't been a problem for the licensing authority. However, they did send C&D letters in the past (to both me and sourceforge (and Rarewares too IIRC)) after which I promised not to distribute binaries anymore. I don't feel that I should start doing that again, just because it seems they don't care that much anymore.
But I wouldn't mind if a new binary would show up on Rarewares

QUOTE(jamesbaud @ Apr 22 2008, 08:04)

QUOTE
Source packages are available in the downloads section. No binary distributions are available here, because they require a patent license.
Pardon my ignorance of patent law, but how is FAAD/FAAC's situation different from LAME's? LAME binaries aren't available at Sourceforge, but they are at Rarewares.
It's not. The quote comes from audiocoding.com, not from Rarewares. The question here is why the binary on Rarewares is so old.