QUOTE(nwn @ Feb 11 2003 - 01:51 AM)
For tagging from internet search Ape & id3 but others format also, this tool
Abander TagControl 1.38
http://www.softartstudio.com/tagcontrol/Support all popular tags:
• MP3 ID3v1 and ID3v2
• OGG (OGG Vorbis)
• WMA (Windows media)
• ASF (Audio & Video)
• APE (Monkey's audio)
• Lyrics (MP3 ID3v2, OGG, WMA, ASF)
• Album Art (MP3 ID3v2, WMA, ASF)
I have tested Mediacenter V9 :- I never finished to index my 7000 files .. 100%Cpu and many hours after i stoped it (dapyx index in 3Omin)
- product is a little bit buggy
- i found it not "ergonomic" at all
- ressource consuming
- the most functionnalities you can find in a product, yes
Dapyx is ... was a very good product ...
http://www.dapyx-soft.com/- Ape & id3 support
- good frontend for Foobar
- no consuming ressource
- speed in indexing
- easy to use
- no lyrics, cover, internet capture, etc...
The choices are :
1) a heavy and major all-in-one soft // Mediacenter (open) ... Realone, WMP (in house)
2) dapyx + foobar // with abander for tagging ? (and addon for lyrics viewer to foobar ...)
It's a fact that many good products like "mediacenter" are vanishing :
-
http://www.mp3-explorer.com/explorer.htm-
http://www.wensoftware.com/MusicLibrary/screen.html-
http://www.dapyx-soft.com/-
http://www.trashsoft.com/-
http://www.iprogramdev.com/And a number of new Tag (Ape in fact ..)) and codec/container appears and people want to use them ...
difficult to support all of them ...
You know, I was surprised, though it is not said, Mpeg Audio Collection does have the support of APE v2 tags! The only thing left - is to find the possibility to write APE v 2 tags form the Internet. Abander Tag Control, you say? I'll try it...
You say, that Dapyx was a very good product, why was? I have downloaded it and try it, but I don't like it very much. You know, I am afraid of monstrous progs like Sound Forge, I'd rather prefer Cool Edit... That's why I hate all-in-one progs... Dapyx seem to be an all-in-one thing. So many buttons... Why is it better than Mpeg Audio Collection 2.90? MAC's catalogs are much liter and it operates faster... That's my IMHO. What do you think? What features have Dapyx which are not adherant to MAC 2.90?