Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Lame command line options precedence
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - Tech
kumar
What does Lame do when it gets (potentially) conflicting command line options? For example, if I say --alt-preset fast standard, but then add -b 96 -mm, are the latter two options ignored? The reason this happens is because I use the Lamer frontend, because it is the only one which runs on my notebook (EAC does not), and allows direct mp3 encoding from line-in.
JohnV
QUOTE
Originally posted by kumar
For example, if I say --alt-preset fast standard, but then add -b 96 -mm, are the latter two options ignored?
No, the settings are not ignored. In this case the lowbitrate limit will be 96kbps and it will be mono encoding.

Some switches do not work with --alt-presets though, which wouldn't otherwise be ignored.
Delirium
QUOTE
Originally posted by kumar
For example, if I say --alt-preset fast standard, but then add -b 96 -mm, are the latter two options ignored?


As JohnV said, they're not ignored, but make sure you put them in that order. "--alt-preset standard -b 96 -mm" would encode using the standard alt-preset but with a minimum bitrate of 96 kbps and mono encoding, but if you did "-b 96 -mm --alt-preset standard" the -b 128 of --alt-preset would override your -b 96 (not sure about the -mm) and so it would be ignored.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.