QUOTE(SebastianG @ Jul 10 2004, 11:52 AM)
I guess the OP got over it. (the thread is really old)
anyhow:
An MPC or other subband- / (lapped) transform- coder's frame usually affects the samples of surrounding frames, too. But they are also usually independently decodable(*). The lack of previos frames in case of a split file introduces some kind of artifact (time domain alias) at the beginning (the overlap part of previos frames is missing). But it's much like a "fade-in" and will sound ok.
(* ignoring a bit-reservoir like in MP3 which renders the first frame(s) undecodable after a split)
bye,
Sebi
I think the artifacts from MPC would be worse than a simple fade-in. In
this thread, I had a problem with a particular file when seeking. The fix was to increase the number of frames decoded before the current. If not enough frames were read, there would be an extremely audible and annoying pop.
Note that I'm not disagreeing with you (as much as it may seem like it

) I tried making a wavelet-based audio format, which turned into a subband one. If the previous blocks were unreadable, the "fade-in" effect was just as you described it. I just think that there is something else going on with the inter-frame dependencies (something like your bit-reservoir asterisk).
A big difference between MPC and MP3 is that the MP3 bit reservoir is only good for 9 frames (?), whereas MPC depends on more than 1024 frames in some samples. This means that the first ~30 seconds might be unreadable in a split MPC.
Feel free to correct me. I don't claim to be an expert or anything.