QUOTE (timh22 @ Feb 19 2009, 10:08)

thats a good point. I suppose many car audio or home theater systems which a capable of album art won't recognize a folder.jpg. In which case your best option is to embed the album art. Also if you have tons of hard drive spaceto spare it probably is not an issue either.
Having album artwork embedded is also handy if you want to send someone a single track and don't necessarily wish to "burden them" with two files. Additionally, embedded artwork is critical for those who lump all their music in one large directory unless they follow a player-specific file naming scheme for the artwork (e.g. Album_cover.jpg).
QUOTE (timh22 @ Feb 19 2009, 10:08)

I always was under the impression embedding art work increased file size, but I certainly could very well be understanding wrong too.
Anecdotally, when I import album artwork in my LAME-encoded MP3s, I
always observe an increase in file size. I use 500x500 JPEGs, when available, between 50k and 125k. Given what greynol said about the default padding size in LAME, that's expected behavior.
If you have various MP3s for which you haven't encoded yourself, you can't always be certain of what settings were used during the encoding process that may have affected the amount of padding. In such cases, you may not be able to guess whether or not embedding artwork will increase the file size unless you view the file in a hex editor (or some other inspector).