Looking through
John33's Vorbis compiles, I noticed that recently a lot of new/improved oggenc versions appeared (all compiled using libvorbis1.0) and that alone from his site the user has the choice from 5 versions of oggenc, not counting the P4 optimized and GCC3.2 compiled versions. If you add the original Vorbis.com vorbis-tools-1.0 package to that and Garf's recent GT3b1 (using oggenc2.2 and his tuned libvorbis), you end up with 7 (!) different versions of oggenc, which could be quite confusing to a newbie.
Luckily most of these versions produce quality-identical results, but I still think this chaos should be cleaned up by either centralizing oggenc development or creating a Recommended Compiles / Settings thread.
dev0
QUOTE(dev0 @ Mar 4 2003 - 04:31 PM)
creating a Recommended Compiles / Settings thread.
or just creating a new section on the rarewares site named experimental or optimized compiles.
They could all pretty much be merged up into one SUPERoggenc!!(

)
How do you guys want to see it?
They could, but the methods of integrating e.g. FLAC support are quite different (from how I understand it, correct me if I'm wrong) between oggencFLAC and oggenc2.x.
But instead of just merging them all into a uberoggenc, merging the improvements into two different versions would IMO be more sensible:
1. oggenc - oggenc supporting uncompressed input for use with CD Rippers etc., fixed things like unicode support, tagging (I sent you a PM about that a while back)...
2. oggencxp - imroved oggenc for the experienced user, including functions like transcoding from lossless formats (either using libs or bins), enhanced tagging support etc.
dev0
MyAdviceIha
Mar 4 2003, 10:37
QUOTE(john33 @ Mar 4 2003 - 08:24 AM)
They could all pretty much be merged up into one SUPERoggenc!!(

)
How do you guys want to see it?
Haha. Sounds good to me. I am always willing try a new complie of something.
If you ask me, such a thread is needed, of course.
As I read here, it seems even more confusing than compared to the old Lame days...
Well, why I visit this Ogg forum:
I use Ogg for movie audio streams, mostly going for low bitrates between 64 and 128 kbit/s.
I use the vorbis.dll included in HeadAC3he 0.23a, that is from 20th July 2002.
1. Is this dll still good, or are there big improvements ?
Welll, if so, perhaps, you could point Dark_Avenger in this direction for an update...
2. Actually, I want to go for High-Quality sound stream in a movie, bitrate between 128 and 160 kbit/s.
So, I encoded by HeadAC3he, Ogg vbr --quality 5.00
(Interestingly, there is a huge bump in theoretical bitrate, shown there, q4.99 has 126 kbit/s, q5.0 = 160 kbit/s,
the result with my audio was averaged 147 kbit/s. )
What is happening at q5.0 ?
With that version lossless channel coupling ?
How do you rate q5 with that OggVorbis from 20th July 2002 ?
comparable to mp3 lame --alt-preset standard ?
or better ?
3. saving stereo information, surround information for DPL, or DPL2/Logic7:
better q5, or q6 ?
Well, I even expereinced in past, that lower q values, resulting in averaged bitrates about 60 - 75 kbit/s, kept surround somehow, not bad for movies.
After tying to decide myself today which version to use, I decided that such a thread is really needed.
But what is the recommended compile at the moment?
John33's (vorgin/FLAC/unicode/2.1) oggenc using the post-1.0 CVS code?
or
Garf's tuned GT3 beta1 (Is he still working on it? Does the CVS include his fixes?)
Some quick thoughts on quality settings:
-q 6: Lossless stereo coupling used all the time; doesn't scale well above this value; should be transparent (~192kbps)
-q 5: Ment to be transparent (~160kbps)
-q 4: ??? sounds good for its bitrate (~128kbps)
...
-q 0: Lowest tuned quality level (-1 is not considered tuned AFAIK), Vorbis Showcase bitrate (~64kbps)
Are there any other commandlines/setting, which are commonly used or serve a specific purpose (Audiobooks, Ultra-Low-Bitrate etc.)?
I'd be willing to create/maintain the Recommended Vorbis Settings and Compiles Thread, if there really is interest in such a thing.
dev0
fragtal
Mar 24 2003, 14:08
QUOTE(dev0 @ Mar 24 2003 - 09:01 PM)
-q 6: Lossless stereo coupling used all the time; doesn't scale well above this value; should be transparent (~192kbps)
-q 5: Ment to be transparent (~160kbps)
That is not true: I read somewhere that lossless stereo coupling sometimes is not used at q7.
And I can still hear artifacts (preecho in castanets.flac or hihat.flac) at -q5 in the 1.0 libs. I recommend -q6 with standard 1.0 libs or -q5 with gt3b1.