Hello everybody,
Let me introduce myself shortly;
My name is Mikael Stalvik, and I am the author of the infamous
what you call "bloatware", Helium.
I have been monitoring a few threads at this site for a couple of days/weeks and thougt
that it was time for me to give some replies.
You probably gonna bomb me with comments after this, but since I think that some of you
acts kind of strange sometimes, I decided to qoute a few of the messages and add some
comments/answers to them.
To start:
1. You don't need Helium to use EAR. Tag files with whatever you would like to.
2. You don't need Helium to export tags. Cut them out with a hex editor (haha, don't think so),
write an own exporter, or get another prg. that suppports exporting of ID3v2 tags.
3. Jan isn't any anyway getting paid for he's posts. I cannot afford that... It's his opinion.
4. All text in this mail are my opinion, respect it or not..
Quotes follows below:
>chant with me: use Vorbis! use Vorbis!
What has that to do with EAR?
That's only advertising...
The format isn't even properly supported yet...
>Will you STFU? It's bad enough that you keep plugging the damn Helium bloatware crap on r3mix, and now on hydrogenaudio? No one will use the crap and ID3V2 with MPC. God damn it.
I just would like to know if you ever had tried Helium, assume you haven't. Helium contains tools that will help ID3 tag users with alot of things
(yes, I know and fully respect that you doesn't use ID3 tags), and the users doesn't thinks that Helium is "bloatware". It's useful for them.
It's like saying MPC and Ogg Vorbis are just another fancy format, done by people which have to much time. But, I don't say so, because I haven't tried it.. It might be really really
good, I don't know. But, saying that it was crap withou having tested it, should I call a fraud.. The same applies to Helium.
>You act like it's a cardinal sin not to have id3v2.
It isn't, but it has some advantages to support ID3v2. Many tools around supports it, and it is actually a standard.
There are som many more or less "strange" tag formats around which isn't correctly standardized, so in my oppionion ID3v2 is the best choise.
For me. I use MP3. Not MPC/Ogg (Doesn't know about the problems, but the problems I have read about, seems just to be incorrect rumours).
>You seriously need to get a grip on things, not to mention stop
preaching about helium2 constantly.
Why preach about all other things like Ogg and other things then?
>To create and manage ID3v1 and v2.x tags, we recommend you to use Heliumē, which can be downloaded at:
http://www.helium2.com
Yes, we recommend that, since Helium offers the most functionallity (if you are a serious tagger).
If you don't use ID3 tags, don't use EAR. It will be useless in that case. You can ofcourse use any other tagging software around, but
since the most supports much less frames than Helium supports, EAR won't be running "in full scale".
>why invent more, eh ? id3v2 format feels like it was invented in the stone age. they just have to keep updating it (and messing up compatibility)
Hasn't beem changed for a long time now.
>or better - go use winamp3's database stuff. no more need to modify files, and it doesn't make stupid external tag files. blah.
Haha.. That thing just crash everytime you try to use it... And Nullsoft is "bloating" WA3, so I don't think that that's so actual for
the most users.. Don't know, just a thought...
>I look at id3v1.1 and see:
>
>Track#
>Title
>Artist
>Album
>Year
>Genre
>Comments
>
>What the heck else would you need? An biography of the artist?
CD#, Remix, Featured Artist, Subtitle. That's very important IMO.
>i AM paid by AOL.
Obviously
>Winamp3 will support all that crap in its database, without making mess in your files / on your hdd.
I will beleve that when I see that.. It justs crash and work extremely bad for me.
It's not a very good idea to store that in an XML database... XML isn't very fast when it comes to collections
of 30k files.
>There isn't anything else needed and it's just bloat to put anything else.
Well, many people think so. You don't need to be extreme and use all 80 fields, but some very relevant fields are missing.
>and who asked you to tell us that helium is the best again ?
You almost begged for that
Thanks and goodnight,
Mikael Stalvik