Tom Servo
Jan 25 2002, 14:54
Do you think the VS.NET C++ compiler produces better code than the VS6 one?
I did compile FAAC, IN_MP4 and IN_FAAD from Jan 25. It's Win32 code. If anyone interested tell me where to put it, so that Dolby can't fux0r me.
rjamorim
Jan 25 2002, 15:10
You should compare which one is faster decoding and encoding AAC.
If VS.NET version is faster, I would really appreciate to host the binaries at my page, if you don't mind. (Btw: all files there are compiled with VC6, in case you want to do comparisions)
Regards;
Roberto.
Tom Servo
Jan 25 2002, 15:52
Dunno, on first thought I'd say the VS.NET compiler would spit out better code. Prob now is how to test VS6 vs VS.NET/VS7.
rjamorim
Jan 25 2002, 15:58
Just use a chronometer.
See how much time each build of FAAD takes to convert AAC -> WAV
And how much time each FAAC takes to convert WAV -> AAC
A track of 5 minutes should be enough to notice any remarkable velocity increase.
Regards;
Roberto.
Tom Servo
Jan 25 2002, 16:06
Gonna test now.
Using that song "Fatboy Slim - Everybody needs a 303", it uses lotsa synthies, I think FAAC has lots to do. Also I'm using that cmdline:
faac -m 4 -o LTP -t -b 128000 303.wav 303.aac
Gonna reedit the post on results.
Trelane
Mar 19 2002, 21:19
Anyone that doesn't download the 21 MB worth of runtime files won't be able to run it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.