Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Newbie Question - is 'alt...160' better than plain 160 in LA
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - Tech
Scorcho
I've been a happy user of Easy CDDA Extractor for the last year. it may not let me use extra command-line options, but it was fast, encoded on the fly using LAME w/o a WAV, and had great tagging options.

having tested with EAC, i'm wondering if the newest '--alt preset 160' tag will sound better than a default 160 HQ tag in LAME. sorry if this is a corny question, but i'm new to the command-line options in LAME.
wildboar
Yes.
Any of the --alt-presets have been tweaked to a higher quality than the standard settings.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.