Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: foobar2000 v1.1.14 final (Read 7247 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final was just released. Please use this thread for general feedback, discussion, etc. that is relevant to this version and is not large enough to merit its own topic in General. Any problems/bugs with 1.1.14, please report to Support.

Quote
2012-08-17
foobar2000 v1.1.14 final has been released. In addition to IETF Opus codec support introduced in the betas, the final version addresses various stability issues.
Download...
Read change log...

Quote
1.1.14
• Added support for the IETF Opus codec.
• Improved compliance of ReplayGain tagging for Opus files (beta 2).
• More robust handling of ID3v2.3 TDAT frames (beta 2).
• Added Opus encoding support in Converter (requires external opusenc.exe binary) (beta 3).
• Fixed a deadlock when reading strange/corrupted zip files (final).
• Fixed a rare deadlock related to updating tags on the file being currently played.
• Fixed a rare deadlock related to starting/stopping playback.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #1 –
Thanks for the update,
Though i can't recall why i installed foo_midi but it says on updating that it is no longer supported in this version and deleted it,no problem with that just to inform.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #2 –
You must have been using an old version of foo_midi.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #3 –
Version 1.1.14a out - rare-now-playing-track-tag-update-crash regression fixed. Thanks to everyone who submitted reports already.
Microsoft Windows: We can't script here, this is bat country.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #4 –
Opusinfo reports a "playback gain" of -12.6797 dB. Fb2k reports an album gain of -7.68 dB. I don't see the value 5 anywhere. Where does it come from?
 

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #5 –
The proposed standard for Opus is R128 gain with a reference level of -23 LUFS. The closest foobar2000 equivalent is to apply a 5 dB offset, since foobar2000 uses an R128 based scanner with a reference level of -18 LUFS, to produce levels similar to ReplayGain.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #6 –
Sorry I'm not sure if I'm dumb or if there is something wrong with the download link on the website.

When I tried to download 1.1.4a, I got a file whose size is about 3kb and doesn't seem to work....

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #7 –
For whatever it’s worth, I can’t reproduce your problem; I just downloaded a 3.2 MB foobar2000_v1.1.14a.exe without problems, using Safari 5.1.7.

What browser are you using? What is the resulting file called, including its extension? Are you using any particular options (be they in your browser, Windows, an antivirus… etc.) that might affect downloads? Is there anything else that you think might be relevant?

If anyone else has this problem, please report it with the same sort of information.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #8 –
I also have the problem bryantalent has. My browser is Firefox 14.0.1 on Windows Vista. When I click the "foobar2000 v1.1.14a" link in the page "http://www.foobar2000.org/download", it showed the "Thank you for downloading foobar2000" for half a second and automatically redirected me to the homepage of Foobar2000.

However I don't have this issue on my other machine, running the same configuration/addons of Firefox 14.0.1 on Windows 7.

Edit: It seems that the issue is fixed for me. Don't really know why or how, but thanks anyway.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #9 –
Quote from: dabeniao on
it showed the "Thank you for downloading foobar2000" for half a second and automatically redirected me to the homepage of Foobar2000.
Did it send you anything at all, such as a small file like bryantalent got?

Glad it seems to be working now, at least for you, so we’ll wait and see how other users get on.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #10 –
There seems to be a bug with the internal Opus decoder: Whenever I convert to WAV the resulting file is way too quiet. There's no processing switched between, and deactivating RG doesn't help either.

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #11 –
Quote from: db1989 on
For whatever it’s worth, I can’t reproduce your problem; I just downloaded a 3.2 MB foobar2000_v1.1.14a.exe without problems, using Safari 5.1.7.

What browser are you using? What is the resulting file called, including its extension? Are you using any particular options (be they in your browser, Windows, an antivirus… etc.) that might affect downloads? Is there anything else that you think might be relevant?

If anyone else has this problem, please report it with the same sort of information.



I'm using chrome right now, and it seems like that the problem persists. I also tried with firefox, same thing happened....

For chrome i got a file named exactly as the real exe file, but for firefox I got an .htm file.

Let me try with IE...

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #12 –
Try clearing your browser cache

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #13 –
Quote from: db1989 on
For whatever it’s worth, I can’t reproduce your problem; I just downloaded a 3.2 MB foobar2000_v1.1.14a.exe without problems, using Safari 5.1.7.

What browser are you using? What is the resulting file called, including its extension? Are you using any particular options (be they in your browser, Windows, an antivirus… etc.) that might affect downloads? Is there anything else that you think might be relevant?

If anyone else has this problem, please report it with the same sort of information.


I think I know whats going on now, since I got the file successfully downloaded with IE.

Cuz the link on the download page is something ending with .exe so my downloader tool recognized it as a file while it actually is a webpage that directs me to the file. So neither with the downloader nor "save link as" would  be able to retrieve the file through that link..

foobar2000 v1.1.14 final

Reply #14 –
Ah, OK. Yes, the site uses dynamically generated links to serve downloads, instead of static links, I imagine because the latter would leave open the possibility of leeching.

As you’ve found, that’s not a problem if one requests the download normally, rather than using an intermediate download manager. So, the solution is don’t use one.