How userfriendly are autosend playlists?
Reply #1 – 2007-10-23 14:46:43
I am not certain if i understand correctly what you are talking about (mostly because you often use the word "autosent playlist" without explaining what it does to people, who never used it). I asume that you mean the often requested feature, that i.e. in albumlist, clicking a node automatically sends those files to the playlist. If you meant something different, then the following thoughts of me will all be off-topic. The main problem which i see here, is that it collides with the common windows convention, that leftclicking an entry, means selecting it - and that doubleclicking an entry means activating it. I am already annoyed about the behaviour of windows regarding inline-edit functionality of some UI-objects (currently used extensively in properties dialog and various preferences pages) - but i can tolerate it, even though it irritates me. However, if something like that were done in albumlist (i.e. single leftclick means send to playlist) then this would get really problematic. For starters, it means that it would no longer be possible to select an item, without doing anything else - you could only rightclick, which would mean "select and show options". Additionally, this would prevent the ability to implement selection of multiple entires with the mouse. And last but not least, it may cause quite a few users to unintentionally overwrite the playlist contents. It is often forgotten, that albumlist can do much more, than just show your library and add tracks to playlist. Everything which you can do to files in a playlist, you can also do to nodes selected in albumlist. This makes it quite useful for certain tagging operations and file ops. I think that the current behaviour of doubleclicking to sent to playlist is robust, simple and in line with conventions. The only thing which i sometimes miss, is the ability to ADD files to the playlist in a similiary quick way - but thats a different topic i guess. - Lyx