TAK 2.0.0 - Beta release
Reply #19 – 2009-12-20 00:41:24
Usually you will only achieve such good results for music with a lot of low amplitude parts and/or low complexity (for example: single instrument, mostly voice). Indeed. Some results follows:E:\temp>takc112 -e *.wav 1.wav .......... 37.48% 309* 2.wav .......... 11.50% 631* 3.wav .......... 11.24% 191* 4.wav .......... 36.93% 311* 5.wav .......... 35.23% 313* 6.wav .......... 58.97% 293* 7.wav .......... 56.39% 297* 8.wav .......... 21.35% 157* 9.wav .......... 20.20% 462* 10.wav .......... 6.31% 203* Compression: 25.92 % Duration: 10.11 sec Speed: 272.66 * real time E:\temp>takc112 -d *.tak 1.tak .......... 383* Ok 2.tak .......... 278* Ok 3.tak .......... 217* Ok 4.tak .......... 271* Ok 5.tak .......... 329* Ok 6.tak .......... 262* Ok 7.tak .......... 334* Ok 8.tak .......... 250* Ok 9.tak .......... 667* Ok 10.tak .......... 179* Ok Duration: 9.76 sec Speed: 282.36 * real time E:\temp>takc200 -e *.wav 1.wav .......... 37.18% 332* 2.wav .......... 11.37% 797* 3.wav .......... 11.07% 263* 4.wav .......... 36.54% 320* 5.wav .......... 34.96% 328* 6.wav .......... 58.75% 313* 7.wav .......... 56.20% 306* 8.wav .......... 21.02% 193* 9.wav .......... 19.99% 568* 10.wav .......... 6.17% 291* Compression: 25.70 % Duration: 8.57 sec Speed: 321.62 * real time E:\temp>takc200 -d *.tak 1.tak .......... 441* Ok 2.tak .......... 377* Ok 3.tak .......... 295* Ok 4.tak .......... 360* Ok 5.tak .......... 393* Ok 6.tak .......... 367* Ok 7.tak .......... 407* Ok 8.tak .......... 288* Ok 9.tak .......... 350* Ok 10.tak .......... 293* Ok Duration: 7.86 sec Speed: 350.67 * real time Something strange with 1.1.2 decode speeds - the results above are from a second run, and the speed improved but it's still not where it should be. In this test hard disk I/O is always a bottleneck. FYI, this test was on a home studio project with a Beatles-like approach to mulitracking. edit: A64 2GHz, 2GB, WinXPsp3, WD120