I've been using and testing FLACCL for some days now, and I ran into some questions:
- will there be tagging support in a future update?
- I've tested up to 24 bits / 96khz / 7.1 channels successfully. will the samples rates 88.2/174.4/192khz be supported at some point (not that I'm a fan of those...)?
- when using flaccl as a command line encoder in foobar, is there a way to force fb2k to use the source wav and not create a temp wav thus slowing the operation down?
- at the moment I'm using batchenc as a gui/frontend and while it skips the foobar delay it lacks tagging. is there a better alternative or a way to include metaflac for the task?
thanks!
btw, here are some benchmarks on a low-end system (with cuetools):
Celeron E1200 @ 1.6 Ghz, FLAC 1.2.1b -8 -V: 22x, +0%
Celeron E1200 @ 3.0 Ghz, FLAC 1.2.1b -8 -V: 42x, +91%
Celeron E1200 @ 1.6 Ghz, Geforce 210 @ default, FLACCL 0.4 -8 --verify --slow-gpu: 53x, +141%
Celeron E1200 @ 3.0 Ghz, Geforce 210 @ default, FLACCL 0.4 -8 --verify --slow-gpu: 73x, +232%