What is your stance on Replaygain support in Vorbis? |
Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules - No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
What is your stance on Replaygain support in Vorbis? |
 May 15 2002, 21:30
Post
#1
|
|
|
Founder Group: Admin Posts: 2958 Joined: 26-August 02 From: Nottingham, UK Member No.: 1  |
Do you believe it's better to store the data in the actual Vorbis tags, where it's more practical, easier to implement, and more likely to gain widespread support?
Or do you believe that it's better to have each individual player handle replaygain itself because it's "The Right Thing", because having the data in the vorbis tags is too much of a kludge, and because it's not the responsibility or goal of Vorbis to deal with this? |
 |
 
|
 |
|
May 16 2002, 01:07
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 20-December 01 Member No.: 701 |
Well considering he is backing up the opinion of his developers then it's easy to understand his statements. I think:rolleyes:
Still though, for me the only "real" soltution I see is to implement the tags inside the container. Any other alternatives that were suggested? Player based is definitely not a good solution IMHO. |
|
|
|
Dibrom What is your stance on Replaygain support in Vorbis? May 15 2002, 21:30
rc55 I'd say vote for the Vorbis tag solution. If anyth... May 15 2002, 22:05 JohnV [01:36] <Paradox> There is a fundamental dif... May 15 2002, 23:45 rjamorim QUOTE Originally posted by JohnV
Paradox is the C... May 15 2002, 23:51 john33 Seems to me that this guy is a true 'anal retentiv... May 16 2002, 00:50 Emmett_v2 Let me make a few things clear.
First off, I've r... May 16 2002, 00:59 Case The values could be stored in header in similar wa... May 16 2002, 01:14 JohnV Ok people, please give proper reasons why rg shoul... May 16 2002, 01:19 Dibrom The biggest problem I see here with this situation... May 16 2002, 02:06 rjamorim QUOTE Originally posted by Dibrom
some core peopl... May 16 2002, 02:16 Dibrom Btw, to everyone in this thread, lets try to keep ... May 16 2002, 02:18 Dibrom QUOTE Originally posted by rjamorim
Hummm... like... May 16 2002, 02:48 rjamorim Just to clarify (Sorry for keeping OT)
I had offe... May 16 2002, 02:53 Emmett_v2 Quoth Dibrom:
"The biggest problem I see here wit... May 16 2002, 02:56 Dibrom QUOTE Originally posted by Emmettfish
Well, remem... May 16 2002, 03:29 krsna77 Ok, before I start in, please understand that I am... May 16 2002, 06:56 Dibrom Actually, this metadata type stuff was discussed v... May 16 2002, 07:47 Lear QUOTE Originally posted by Emmettfish
Many moons... May 16 2002, 08:03 damjang I think that ReplayGain data should be implemented... May 16 2002, 08:19 YinYang QUOTE Originally posted by Dibrom
Actually, this ... May 16 2002, 09:24 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by Emmettfish
On the oth... May 16 2002, 19:00 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by Case
The values could ... May 16 2002, 19:01 Emanuel Just an idea, wich I realize might take some time ... May 16 2002, 19:04 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by Dibrom
Actually, this ... May 16 2002, 19:05 Garf I see three problem areas right now:
a) Store dat... May 16 2002, 19:34 Randum Really I'm not clear on what Emmett's definition o... May 16 2002, 21:44 Emmett_v2 Quoth Randum:
"Really I'm not clear on what Emmet... May 17 2002, 02:40 Randum QUOTE Originally posted by Emmettfish
Quoth Randu... May 17 2002, 03:13 2Bdecided I'm glad Radium picked up on this fine point!
The... May 17 2002, 10:59 2Bdecided I know it's been kindly said several times in the ... May 17 2002, 14:13 tw101 I'm late to this discussion, for I need to study f... May 18 2002, 14:37 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by tw101
Question 1:
If... May 18 2002, 16:49 Lear QUOTE Originally posted by tw101
I don't think I ... May 18 2002, 18:29 tw101 QUOTE Originally posted by Lear
That's what we'... May 19 2002, 15:11 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by tw101
What puzzled me... May 19 2002, 15:33 tw101 QUOTE Originally posted by Garf
There is no need ... May 19 2002, 15:44 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by tw101
Ok, but how muc... May 19 2002, 16:12 tw101 QUOTE Originally posted by Garf
[b]This is the on... May 20 2002, 09:27 2Bdecided I didn't think my opinion would interest anyone...... May 20 2002, 11:29 tw101 QUOTE Originally posted by 2Bdecided
I didn't thi... May 20 2002, 12:32 2Bdecided tw101,
Don't worry - my sarcastic comment wasn't ... May 20 2002, 13:18 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by tw101
<backing awa... May 20 2002, 18:23 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by 2Bdecided
But no one ... May 20 2002, 18:24 Dibrom QUOTE Originally posted by Garf
You are right - ... May 20 2002, 21:39 Garf QUOTE Originally posted by Dibrom
To clarify, of... May 21 2002, 19:13 JohnV Well Garf, to tell you the truth I'd be very surpr... May 21 2002, 21:42
Garf QUOTE Originally posted by JohnV
All in all, the... May 22 2002, 19:33 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 00:32 |
