Spectral Analysis : DVD-Audio Vs. CDDA, Making sense of the pictures? |
![]() ![]() |
Spectral Analysis : DVD-Audio Vs. CDDA, Making sense of the pictures? |
Jul 9 2005, 22:20
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
First of all, I'm clearly new to both spectral analysis and DVD-Audio... And it's possible I haven't ripped the DVD-Audio disc properly either... Take a look at these images and let me know what you think:
The source material is from Björk's Medúlla, which is a heavily processed vocal only album: CDDA 2.0 16bit 44.1khz ![]() DVD-Audio 2.0 24bit 96khz ![]() DVD-Audio 5.1 24bit 96khz ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Have I ripped it correctly? |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2005, 23:12
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 119 Joined: 18-March 05 From: Wichita, KS Member No.: 20701 |
On the "DVD-Audio 2.0 24bit 96khz" one it looks like the only audio above 22050 is from clipping distortion and a bit of aliasing. On the "DVD-Audio 5.1 24bit 96khz" ones everything above 22050 is just aliasing.
-------------------- My photo gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/inghramjp
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2005, 23:42
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
Does this means its actually 48khz? (I tried ripping a track at 48000 but the WAV played back half speed in Audition)
So they've used "quarter resolution" (22khz), upsampled to "half resolution" (48khz), to save space on the disc? It's a DL disc with DVD-Audio in 2.0 and 5.1 plus the usual DD5.1, DTS 5.1, PCM 2.0.... AND a 2Gb documentary VOB file too... Which means they had to drop the resolution to fit everything on right? |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 01:28
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2090 Joined: 29-June 02 From: Boston Member No.: 2427 |
**EDIT**
Geez, I don't read every thread for a few days and look what I miss. This post has been edited by dreamliner77: Jul 10 2005, 02:33 -------------------- "You can fight without ever winning, but never win without a fight." Neil Peart 'Resist'
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 01:51
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2476 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
The DVD-A rips have the same frequency range as the CD. So either you ripped it wrong, or they ripped you off
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 02:41
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
Considering they stuffed a helluva lot into 7Gb ("DVD-Audio in 2.0 and 5.1 plus the usual DD5.1, DTS 5.1, PCM 2.0.... AND a 2Gb documentary VOB file too...") it's probably not surprising that I've been "ripped off"... I'll not complain though, the multichannel 24bit surround still sounds fantastic, even if only in a resolution slightly superior to CDDA!
I ripped another DVD-A disc too... Here's a spectral snapshot of one of the DVD-A 5.1 channels: ![]() This is from an album that was originally released in 1998 on CDDA, remastered in 5.1 just last year - it actually won the award for Best Multichannel Reissue at the Surround Music Awards in the US in August last year. Looking any better? |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 03:05
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
Here's the frequency analysis of one of the channels of the Bjork DVD-A 5.1:
![]() And here it is for "Refused" (The other DVD-A disc I ripped):
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 11:33
Post
#8
|
|
![]() LAME developer Group: Developer Posts: 2950 Joined: 1-October 01 From: Nanterre, France Member No.: 138 |
QUOTE (encosion @ Jul 10 2005, 02:41 AM) Considering they stuffed a helluva lot into 7Gb ("DVD-Audio in 2.0 and 5.1 plus the usual DD5.1, DTS 5.1, PCM 2.0.... AND a 2Gb documentary VOB file too...") it's probably not surprising that I've been "ripped off"... I'll not complain though, the multichannel 24bit surround still sounds fantastic, even if only in a resolution slightly superior to CDDA! I ripped another DVD-A disc too... Here's a spectral snapshot of one of the DVD-A 5.1 channels: ![]() This is from an album that was originally released in 1998 on CDDA, remastered in 5.1 just last year - it actually won the award for Best Multichannel Reissue at the Surround Music Awards in the US in August last year. Looking any better? Incredible! It features the TV pilot line at about 16kHz, and this pilot line seems to be aliased to 31kHz. At least visually it seems to not be so good. |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 16:31
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
Could you explain what a "TV pilot line" is? I can see what you're talking about, but what does it mean?
P.S. The track is actually called "Liberation Frequency", so it could be conceptual... Here's a snippet of the lyrics for kicks: "It's coming through the air for all of us to hear. Could it be the sounds of liberation or just the image of detention? We want the airwaves back ... We don't just want airtime we want all the time all of the time ... We want transmission for the people by the people. What frequency are you getting? Is it noise or sweet sweet music? On what frequency will liberation be? ..." This post has been edited by encosion: Jul 10 2005, 16:37 |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 17:01
Post
#10
|
|
![]() MPC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 543 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 659 |
QUOTE (Gabriel @ Jul 10 2005, 12:33 PM) Incredible! It features the TV pilot line at about 16kHz, and this pilot line seems to be aliased to 31kHz. At least visually it seems to not be so good. The source depends on the exact frequency. 15.625 kHz + 31.250 kHz: horizontal deflection + 2nd harmonic (CCIR or OIRT) 15.734 kHz + 31.468 kHz: horizontal deflection + 2nd harmonic (FCC) 15.625 kHz + 32.375 kHz: horizontal deflection + aliasing on 48 kHz 15.734 kHz + 32.266 kHz: horizontal deflection + aliasing on 48 kHz 15.625 kHz + 28.475 kHz: horizontal deflection + aliasing on 44.1 kHz 15.734 kHz + 28.336 kHz: horizontal deflection + aliasing on 44.1 kHz 31 kHz looks more like 2nd harmonic (of the sawtooth horizontal deflection). EDIT: Visit the image again. There is a line at about 30,5 kHz and another one about 31,3 kHz. And then there are lines at 42 and 44 kHz. But your're right: All above 20 kHz is noise or distortion, i.e. shit. An the loudness race also starts on DVD-A. This post has been edited by Frank Klemm: Jul 10 2005, 17:07 -------------------- -- Frank Klemm
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 17:13
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 750 Joined: 10-May 04 Member No.: 14009 |
How did you rip the DVD audio? That isn't possible with commercially available equipment apparently.
-------------------- Qui tollis peccata mundi
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 17:15
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 21:42
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 11863 |
QUOTE Could you explain what a "TV pilot line" is? I can see what you're talking about, but what does it mean? In a TV broadcast video pilot frequency is inside audio signal (or in some very old cases it was an audio signal itself)... Anyway, this record seems to contain some pilot line for broadcasting |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 22:51
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2476 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
QUOTE (SirGrey @ Jul 10 2005, 12:42 PM) QUOTE Could you explain what a "TV pilot line" is? I can see what you're talking about, but what does it mean? In a TV broadcast video pilot frequency is inside audio signal (or in some very old cases it was an audio signal itself)... Anyway, this record seems to contain some pilot line for broadcasting So the source for the DVD-A was actually a recording made for broadcast TV? |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2005, 23:19
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
Ok... I can confirm that signal only appears in that track... How's my luck I picked that track!
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 00:27
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 292 Joined: 21-September 03 Member No.: 8934 |
That signal appears in many many many recordings. It can be caused by something as simple as a TV being on in the recording studio.
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 05:34
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 371 Joined: 27-September 03 Member No.: 9041 |
Here's some more
http://www.evilboris.sonic-cult.net/dvda/ I put up analysis pics for the track "Dance of Death" from the self-titled Iron Maiden DVD Audio disc. The MLP versions were both 88200Hz, with the 6chn version being 24bit while the stereo mix was 16bit. The rest is from the DVD Video part of the disc, a stereo LPCM and two 6chn rips - AC3 and DTS. All of them being 48khz. The AC3 was 448kbps while the DTS was 1509 kbps. For the 6chn rips, the channel order is left, right, center, LFE, rear left, rear right. Unfortunetaly, I don't have the CD version of this album to compare Does anyone have it for some quick comparisons? -------------------- http://evilboris.sonic-cult.net/346/
Sega Saturn, Shiro! |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 05:48
Post
#18
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 18-February 05 Member No.: 19936 |
what are you using to get those images?
-------------------- - sig removed, no code allowed
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 05:54
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 371 Joined: 27-September 03 Member No.: 9041 |
Adobe Audition / Cool Edit Pro (same thing, Adobe bought and rebranded it)
-------------------- http://evilboris.sonic-cult.net/346/
Sega Saturn, Shiro! |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 12:14
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moderator Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3907 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 73 |
Acoustic or electronic music don't expand very much above 20 kHz. It's not surprising to see the audiogram decreasing above this frequency.
Moreover the signal will be limited by microphone or recording amplifiers frequency response. QUOTE (Gabriel @ Jul 10 2005, 12:33 PM) Incredible! It features the TV pilot line at about 16kHz, and this pilot line seems to be aliased to 31kHz. At least visually it seems to not be so good. In order to get a proper idea, we need the color scale of the audiogram. A TV pilot line recorded at -120 dB is completely harmless. If the audiogram was more detailed in the 40-100 Hz zone, we would very likely see a 50 or 60 Hz component too, caused by the presence of electric plugs in the recording studio. |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 15:08
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 23265 |
QUOTE In order to get a proper idea, we need the color scale of the audiogram. A TV pilot line recorded at -120 dB is completely harmless. so how do you get to see the color scale of the audiogram ? is that what some of those specialised video scopes are for ? is there a way to do it in software ? |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 16:06
Post
#22
|
|
|
Moderator Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3907 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 73 |
We just need to know how much decibels are each color in the posted pictures.
For example, Yellow = 0 db Red = -10 dB Purple = -20 dB Blue = -30 dB Black < -30 dB Would be very annoying, baceause it would mean the the pilot tone would be louder than -30 dB. On the other hand, if Yellow = 0 dB Red = -40 dB Purple = -80 dB Blue = -120 dB Black <-120 dB Then the pilot tone is inaudible, since it is around -80 dB. |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 16:33
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 738 Joined: 16-January 04 From: Germany Member No.: 11279 |
QUOTE (Scipio @ Jul 11 2005, 03:08 PM) In cool edit, just select "spectral view"... QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Jul 11 2005, 04:06 PM) We just need to know how much decibels are each color in the posted pictures. For example, Yellow = 0 db Red = -10 dB Purple = -20 dB Blue = -30 dB Black < -30 dB Would be very annoying, baceause it would mean the the pilot tone would be louder than -30 dB. On the other hand, if Yellow = 0 dB Red = -40 dB Purple = -80 dB Blue = -120 dB Black <-120 dB Then the pilot tone is inaudible, since it is around -80 dB. Nice explanation, Pio. I consider myself a skilled cool edit user, but afaik there's nowhere such a scaling. In the help it just says that blue is quiet and yellow is loud and such. Anyway, I don't find spectral view very informative. To messure available frequency content, I'd rather use the frequency analysis window, not only because of the lacking colour scale. @Borisz: I'd prefer much more to see the amplitude-time screenshots.. edit: Maybe I'll try to generate sine waves at known frequencies and amplitude so I can find out a rough relation between the colour and its loudness... This post has been edited by precisionist: Jul 11 2005, 17:10 -------------------- I know that I know nothing. But how can I then know that ?
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 16:57
Post
#24
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 18-February 05 Member No.: 19936 |
here's some of The Collector by Nine Inch Nails complete with crappy jpeg compression
CD audio was resampled to 96khz to show the massive empty spot above 22.05KHz (this is where someone points out an easier way to show the same thing without resampling a 44.1KHz file to 96KHz making me feel dumb for a moment) http://jim7.home.insightbb.com/random/collectorCD-DA.jpg http://jim7.home.insightbb.com/random/collectorDVD-A.jpg -------------------- - sig removed, no code allowed
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 18:26
Post
#25
|
|
![]() MPC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 543 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 659 |
QUOTE (necropimp @ Jul 11 2005, 05:57 PM) here's some of The Collector by Nine Inch Nails complete with crappy jpeg compression CD audio was resampled to 96khz to show the massive empty spot above 22.05KHz (this is where someone points out an easier way to show the same thing without resampling a 44.1KHz file to 96KHz making me feel dumb for a moment) http://jim7.home.insightbb.com/random/collectorCD-DA.jpg http://jim7.home.insightbb.com/random/collectorDVD-A.jpg Please an also a plot of the waveform, to see where are overloads possible. -------------------- -- Frank Klemm
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 14:13 |