LAME 3.97b2, New beta release |
  |
LAME 3.97b2, New beta release |
 Nov 28 2005, 22:41
Post
#26
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1394 Joined: 20-December 01 From: seattle Member No.: 693  |
QUOTE (5paz @ Nov 27 2005, 05:14 PM) Hi, Is there a apt-key signature key for your debian RareWare repositories. I'm using sid and I can just use --allow-unauthenticated with apt-get but I like to use aptitude and it just looks ugly  with all those U's splattered all over the place.thanks  no. i don't develop/package with a key yet (so, none is available for the repo). It isn't a high priority, either. (...oh, i'll get to 3.97b2 when i get home from work, btw) later This post has been edited by xmixahlx: Nov 28 2005, 22:42 -------------------- RareWares/Debian :: http://www.rarewares.org/debian.html
|
 |
 
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 15:34
Post
#27
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 8-December 01 From: Indiana, U.S.A. Member No.: 608 |
QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 28 2005, 05:12 AM) I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release. It's unclear to me, has this been done now ?  EDIT: I'm not quite sure how to go about checking for announcement of the beta 2 version at Sourceforge, is there a link ? Regards, Madrigal This post has been edited by Madrigal: Nov 29 2005, 15:38 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 15:49
Post
#28
|
|
 xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (Madrigal @ Nov 29 2005, 02:34 PM) QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 28 2005, 05:12 AM) I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release. It's unclear to me, has this been done now ? EDIT: I'm not quite sure how to go about checking for announcement of the beta 2 version at Sourceforge, is there a link ? Regards, Madrigal All the beta 2 compiles now at Rarewares are the final beta 2 versions. 
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 15:54
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 8-December 01 From: Indiana, U.S.A. Member No.: 608 |
QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 29 2005, 09:49 AM) All the beta 2 compiles now at Rarewares are the final beta 2 versions. Thank you.  Regards, Madrigal |
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 16:10
Post
#30
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
Thanks John.
NB: lamedropXPd says it is using beta 1. Edit: On Encoding Options dialogue. I like the spinning LAME logo.
This post has been edited by Synthetic Soul: Nov 29 2005, 16:12 -------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 17:10
Post
#31
|
|
|
xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Nov 29 2005, 03:10 PM) Thanks John. NB: lamedropXPd says it is using beta 1. Edit: On Encoding Options dialogue. Oh b*gg*r!! OK, I've fixed that and uploaded again. It was only the narrative, it was using the correct libs. BTW, thanks for letting me know. QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Nov 29 2005, 03:10 PM) I like the spinning LAME logo. 
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 18:45
Post
#32
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 665 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Italy Member No.: 18968 |
Thanks a bunch, john33! Appreciated.
-------------------- WavPack 4.60.1 -hx6b4cm/qaac 2.15 -V 100
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2005, 23:01
Post
#33
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 15-December 03 Member No.: 10468 |
QUOTE (DARcode @ Nov 29 2005, 09:45 AM) Thanks a bunch, john33! Appreciated. Same here! Thx to the LAME devs also! 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 01:21
Post
#34
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1350 Joined: 4-March 02 From: Indianapolis, IN Member No.: 1440 |
...and I just finished encoding 11,000+ songs with B1, lol. Glad I have them all FLAC'd.
-------------------- Wait Master, it might be dangerous... you go first.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 02:40
Post
#35
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 9-February 05 From: county down Member No.: 19713 |
note: Theres only a point in re-encoding if they're at preset fast medium or insane. Not an urgent need to do so even if so.
This post has been edited by ChiGung: Nov 30 2005, 06:55 -------------------- no conscience > no custom
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 02:42
Post
#36
|
|
|
Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1350 Joined: 4-March 02 From: Indianapolis, IN Member No.: 1440 |
-V 2 --vbr-new -Y
That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-) -------------------- Wait Master, it might be dangerous... you go first.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 15:20
Post
#37
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 410 Joined: 20-October 04 From: UK Member No.: 17750 |
QUOTE (ChiGung @ Nov 30 2005, 01:40 AM) insane. te he - now that's a sneaky little link in the 'i' isn't it -------------------- http://www.health4ni.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 16:58
Post
#38
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 7-October 05 Member No.: 24956 |
lamedropXPd writes comment field: Encoded using LAME-3.97b1 in tag.
This post has been edited by Analog: Nov 30 2005, 17:03 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 17:13
Post
#39
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 19-October 05 Member No.: 25221 |
QUOTE (indybrett @ Nov 29 2005, 07:42 PM) -V 2 --vbr-new -Y That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-) Sorry, but what is -Y for? |
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 17:17
Post
#40
|
|
|
Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1350 Joined: 4-March 02 From: Indianapolis, IN Member No.: 1440 |
QUOTE (Vivadavid @ Nov 30 2005, 11:13 AM) QUOTE (indybrett @ Nov 29 2005, 07:42 PM) -V 2 --vbr-new -Y That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-) Sorry, but what is -Y for? Disables SFB21, so nothing above 16khz is encoded. Personal preference, because I can't hear that high anyway, and it reduces filesize. Edit: yes, i know about preset medium
This post has been edited by indybrett: Nov 30 2005, 17:18 -------------------- Wait Master, it might be dangerous... you go first.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 17:43
Post
#41
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 9-February 05 From: county down Member No.: 19713 |
QUOTE (jaybeee @ Nov 30 2005, 02:20 PM) te he - now that's a sneaky little link in the 'i' isn't it -must be a bug in the forum software hawkeye...
-------------------- no conscience > no custom
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2005, 18:25
Post
#42
|
|
|
xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (Analog @ Nov 30 2005, 03:58 PM) lamedropXPd writes comment field: Encoded using LAME-3.97b1 in tag. And, again - b*gg*r!! I think I'll simply remove that tag - it's not exactly necessary. Thanks for the notification. I'll upload again a little later.
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2005, 09:14
Post
#43
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 7-July 05 From: Boston, MA Member No.: 23188 |
QUOTE lame.exe fixed for .mp2 and mp3 decoding: lame.exe only (ICL4.5). For mp3 and mp2 decoding, this now yields the same output as foobar2000 but the error checking remains unchanged. 2005-11-29 That's for 3.97b2. 3.97b1 had a fixed exe as well from what I remember and 3.96.1. Why have a fixed exe for decoding separately for each version? Can't the fixes be included in the regular versions? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2005, 11:05
Post
#44
|
|
|
xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (Spooon69 @ Dec 3 2005, 08:14 AM) QUOTE lame.exe fixed for .mp2 and mp3 decoding: lame.exe only (ICL4.5). For mp3 and mp2 decoding, this now yields the same output as foobar2000 but the error checking remains unchanged. 2005-11-29 That's for 3.97b2. 3.97b1 had a fixed exe as well from what I remember and 3.96.1. Why have a fixed exe for decoding separately for each version? Can't the fixes be included in the regular versions? The necessary changes have now been merged into the latest 3.98alpha so there will be no more 'fixed' versions after the 3.97 ones.
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2005, 15:56
Post
#45
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1303 Joined: 14-September 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 24472 |
QUOTE (Synaptic Line Noise @ Nov 28 2005, 07:14 PM) o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC. I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange. This has obviously changed. Analyzing silent parts is much faster now. I tested the behavior in this thread: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=39198. -------------------- http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2005, 16:08
Post
#46
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1303 Joined: 14-September 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 24472 |
I just noticed this.
"Your file doesn't exist, or you didn't select one." The Win32 and LameDrop XPd download links at the recommended LAME compiles Wiki page are broken: List of recommended LAME compiles http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Lame_Compiles -------------------- http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2005, 11:27
Post
#47
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 29-November 05 Member No.: 26089 |
3.98a2 (up at Rarewares); is it safe?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2005, 12:08
Post
#48
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 25-September 04 From: Sweden Member No.: 17288 |
QUOTE (huh-hah @ Dec 7 2005, 12:27 PM) 3.98a2 (up at Rarewares); is it safe? From This sticky thread: Lame alphas are ONLY for testing. Do NOT use Lame alphas unless you want to test it and maybe provide feedback. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2005, 12:53
Post
#49
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 29-November 05 Member No.: 26089 |
QUOTE (larswes @ Dec 7 2005, 12:08 PM) From This sticky thread: Lame alphas are ONLY for testing. Do NOT use Lame alphas unless you want to test it and maybe provide feedback. thanks. yes, i know it says that. i'm still curious if anyone has had any problems running it. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2005, 12:56
Post
#50
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 394 Joined: 6-May 04 Member No.: 13932 |
Maybe you can tell us your experiences in the meanwhile?
This post has been edited by stephanV: Dec 7 2005, 12:56 -------------------- "We cannot win against obsession. They care, we don't. They win."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 14:01 |
