AAC vs LAME Mp3 Battery drain on Sony E series |
AAC vs LAME Mp3 Battery drain on Sony E series |
Mar 15 2011, 17:08
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 15-March 11 Member No.: 89019 |
Hi, I have a Sony E353 walkman mp3 player (also plays ogg, aac, flac, etc) anyway, I was thinking of converting my library to AAC 156kbps VBR but I was wondering if that or LAME q3 would drain the battery more, at identical bitrates, let's say 128 CBR for both AAC and LAME Mp3 (I'm using version 3.98.4) which would be a bigger drain on the battery?
Thanks so much for your help |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 5 2011, 10:09
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
Why are you bumping this thread almost a month later after no activity? The OP was asking if anyone here had a very specific Sony player and if owners of that player had conducted any battery drain tests of their own. The quickest solution for the OP would be to just make a series of playlists themselves (one for each respective format), sync them to the player, and spend a weekend draining the battery to see which one would push the player the longest amount of time. Your almost one month reply is actually less helpful to the OP as what saratoga stated. Granted, their reply may have been a little short and lacking explanation but it was an actual reply to the dated topic at hand.
|
|
|
|
zvnteq777 AAC vs LAME Mp3 Battery drain on Sony E series Mar 15 2011, 17:08
saratoga Test it and find out. Mar 15 2011, 17:24
yao QUOTE (saratoga @ Mar 15 2011, 17:24) Tes... Apr 5 2011, 08:23
Brand Don't know about the Sony walkman, but on a No... Jun 13 2011, 10:34
Brand QUOTE (Brand @ Jun 13 2011, 10:34) Don... Jan 27 2012, 10:03
HTS Resurrecting the topic.
Are these occurrences mor... Jan 27 2012, 07:12
slks It seems to just depend on how efficient the parti... Jan 27 2012, 08:54
saratoga QUOTE (HTS @ Jan 27 2012, 01:12) Are thes... Jan 27 2012, 19:26![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 09:59 |