EAC C2 error correction, Use it or not? |
EAC C2 error correction, Use it or not? |
 May 29 2003, 22:56
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 97 Joined: 14-April 02 Member No.: 1781  |
My drive supports C2 error correction and I have been using it always since it gives the fastest rips for me, while still no errors are reported and all track qualities are above 99.5%. Using this option, I get rip speeds of 18x and I was wondering whether C2 error correction is really that reliable? I mean, I never get error messages, the track quality is always reported to be over 99.5% and I cannot hear any audible difference. Is there any incentive NOT to rip at 18x under these conditions?! Btw, my drive is a LiteOn 48x CDRW (I can't remember the model name off the top of my head)
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
May 30 2003, 18:21
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 456 Joined: 22-March 02 From: Belgium Member No.: 1596 |
QUOTE (Pio2001 @ May 30 2003 - 12:26 AM) This CRC method only works for tracks with errors detected, and all corrected, that is very uncommon. (The only way so far to test the C2 accuracy is the DAEquality kit) EDIT : I'm talking about the CRC method for checking secure mode, not for checking a rip (in the latter case, it nearly always works). Could you explain this a little bit further? (not sure what you mean). I'd expect Atici's method works quite well. -------------------- "E S S E N T I A L" Guide for E A C :
http://users.fulladsl.be/spb2267/ |
|
|
|
RiskyP EAC C2 error correction May 29 2003, 22:56
atici Compare the CRCs of your reads with and without C2... May 29 2003, 23:01 Pio2001 This CRC method only works for tracks with errors ... May 30 2003, 00:26 RiskyP I could not find info on cdrinfo.com but thanks fo... May 30 2003, 16:17 RiskyP This is a bit off topic, but how much do you think... May 30 2003, 17:13 atici You may want to check this thread about the setti... May 30 2003, 18:24 Pio2001 I meant that if you turn C2 on, then test and copy... May 30 2003, 19:35 atici Yes, you're right! I knew that. But that... May 30 2003, 19:52 Pio2001 I don't know, I still must verify Tigre's ... May 30 2003, 19:56 atici But wasn't it you who said when you unset ... May 30 2003, 20:49 Pio2001 When C2 is unset, the drive doesn't take C2 in... May 31 2003, 01:09 liekloo QUOTE (Pio2001 @ May 30 2003 - 07:35 PM)I mea... May 31 2003, 21:36 atici @liekloo : I think you're too much of a stickl... May 31 2003, 23:03 Pio2001 QUOTE (atici @ Jun 1 2003 - 01:03 AM)I trust ... Jun 1 2003, 01:25 atici QUOTE a) 990 not repeatable and detected by C2.
b... Jun 1 2003, 06:22 westgroveg If someone was to test the C2 info of their CD-ROM... Jun 1 2003, 06:48 liekloo QUOTE (atici @ May 31 2003 - 11:03 PM)the kin... Jun 1 2003, 16:32 Pio2001 QUOTE (atici @ Jun 1 2003 - 08:22 AM)I think ... Jun 1 2003, 18:41 moikboy If i rip with c2, i rip the data twice, and compar... Feb 6 2008, 21:52 greynol Whoa, resurrection of a 4.5 year old thread!
... Feb 6 2008, 22:08 Shamray Hello!
"CD ROMs are like audio CD with ... Mar 30 2011, 07:36
pdq QUOTE (Shamray @ Mar 30 2011, 02:36) Hell... Mar 30 2011, 13:53 JunkieXL Sheesh... what's with the random resurrection ... Mar 30 2011, 21:13 mjb2006 The first revival of the thread was on topic and m... Mar 30 2011, 22:35 greynol My last post was a bit difficult to follow if take... Mar 30 2011, 22:55 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 00:31 |
